Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2025 Mar 17

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  SPORT INJURIES AND REHABILITATION 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2025 Mar 17

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16101-X

Copyright © 2025 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Acute effects of handheld percussive massage therapy on various posterior shoulder soft tissue areas in healthy young males

Takaki IMAI 1 , Takashi NAGAMATSU 1, Yushin YOSHIZATO 1, Kodai MIYARA 1, Megumi SUMIZONO 1, Masatoshi NAKAMURA 2

1 Department of Rehabilitation, Kyushu University of Nursing and Social Welfare, Tamana, Japan; 2 Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nishi Kyushu University, Kanzaki, Japan


PDF


BACKGROUND: Interventions using vibration stimulation can increase the range of motion (ROM) without compromising muscle strength. Handheld percussive massage directly stimulates the focal area. Therefore, its effectiveness may be affected depending on the areas of stimulation. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effects of handheld percussive massage to different stimulation areas on shoulder internal rotation ROM and shoulder external rotation muscle strength and torque.
METHODS: This crossover study included 15 healthy male volunteers (20.6±1.5 years). A 5-min percussive massage was applied to three posterior shoulder areas: the muscle belly, proximal muscle-tendon junction, and distal muscle-tendon junction. Internal rotation ROM (vertebral level and abduction position) and external rotation muscle strength (isometric and concentric) were measured before and immediately after the intervention and compared.
RESULTS: Internal rotation ROM (vertebral level and abduction position) showed a time effect (P<0.05). No interaction or between-condition effects were observed. Post hoc testing showed a change in internal rotation ROM (vertebral level and abduction position) after intervention at the three stimulation areas (P<0.05). Muscular strength did not show any interaction, time, or between-condition effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Handheld percussive massage therapy to various posterior shoulder soft tissue areas increased the internal rotation ROM without decreasing the external rotation maximum voluntary contraction torque.


KEY WORDS: Shoulder; Massage; Range of motion, articular; Muscle strength

top of page