ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 April;62(4):448-56

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12236-4

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Quantification of training and match load in elite youth soccer players: a full-season study

Hadi NOBARI ^{1, 2, 3} ✉, Amir BARJASTE ^{4, 5}, Hamed HAGHIGHI ⁶, Filipe M. CLEMENTE ^{7, 8}, Jorge CARLOS-VIVAS ⁹, Jorge PÉREZ-GÓMEZ ⁹

¹ Department of Physiology, School of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain; ² Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran; ³ Sepahan Football Club, Isfahan, Iran; ⁴ Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran; ⁵ Rahman Institute of Higher Education, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Ramsar, Iran; ⁶ Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran; ⁷ Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal; ⁸ Instituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, Lisboa, Portugal; ⁹ HEME Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to quantify training and match load in elite young soccer players over the course of an entire season.
METHODS: Using a longitudinal design, session-rate of perceived exertion (s-RPE) and its metrics (weekly acute workload [wAW], acute to chronic workload ratio [wACWR], training monotony and training strain) were examined in twenty-one elite young soccer players (mean±standard deviation; age: 16.1±0.2 years; height: 176.8±5.6 cm; body mass: 67.3±5.7 kg; BMI: 21.5±1.4 kg/m²; V̇O2max: 47.6±3.8 mL.kg^-1.min^-1) during the whole season containing 4 meso-cycles: preseason (Pre-S), early-season (Ear-S), mid-season (Mid-S), and end-season (End-S).
RESULTS: Repeated-measures analysis of variance examined variations in s-RPE load data across the 4 meso-cycles and 1-week of microcycle. Analyzing data revealed the End-S had a significant greater wAW compared to Early-S (P=0.002, g=0.96) and Mid-S (P<0.001, g=1.09). However, no differences between in-season periods were observed in wACWR (P=0.524). The within-week variations revealed significant lower wAW in prematch a day (M^D-1) (P<0.001), 1 day after match (M^D+1) (P<0.001) and 2 days after match (M^D+2) (P<0.001) compared to match day (M^D) for overall team analysis. Additionally, analyses by playing position showed that fullbacks have a significant lower AW in M^D+2 compared to M^D (P<0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: The periodization of training load indicated variations across the whole season in young elite players. The weekly microcycle perceived load could be identified as follows; there are higher training loads on M^D-3 and M^D-2 which was similar to intensities experienced by players throughout the match play and, furthermore, lower overall WL on the M^D+1 and M^D+2 in order to ensure the optimal recovery of the players.

KEY WORDS: Football; Workload; Exercise