Home > Journals > Minerva Dental and Oral Science > Past Issues > Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2024 April;73(2) > Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2024 April;73(2):88-95

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2024 April;73(2):88-95

DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04761-7

Copyright © 2023 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Color stability and marginal adaptation of ceramic veneers cemented using different composite resins

Basma R. FAYAD 1 , Maged M. ZOHDY 1, 2, Ghada A. HUSSEIN 2, Engy A. FARAG 1

1 Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, British University, Cairo, Egypt; 2 Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt



BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the color stability and marginal adaption of lithium disilicate veneers before and after thermocycling using various resin composite materials employed as cement.
METHODS: Laminate veneer preparation was done on an acrylic tooth according to standardized procedures. The veneer preparations were duplicated into twenty-one dies. The veneers were fabricated from lithium disilicate using the CEREC in Lab system. According to the cement type, the twenty-one die specimens were randomly divided into three equal groups: group I, with light cured adhesive resin cement (N.=7), group II, with flowable light cured composite, and group III, with preheated nano filled composite. The cemented specimens underwent 5000 thermocycling cycles. Color was assessed using a reflective spectrophotometer. The vertical marginal gap, following cementation and thermocycling, was measured using a digital microscope. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to statistically assess the data.
RESULTS: After thermocycling, there was no statistically significant difference in ΔE among cement type groups for color stability (P=0.369). However, the preheated composite showed the lowest ΔE mean values. Within adhesive resin cement and flowable composite groups, marginal gap means values recorded after thermocycling were significantly higher than those after cementation (P=0.013 and P<0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although preheated composite cement showed the highest marginal discrepancy, it would be the best choice regarding color stability.


KEY WORDS: Dental veneers; Dental marginal adaptation; Ceramics; Materials testing

top of page