![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |

YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Minerva Cardiology and Angiology 2025 April;73(2):174-83
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06665-1
Copyright © 2024 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Circadian variation in patients with acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Kenichi MATSUSHITA 1, 2 ✉, Kazumasa HARADA 1, Takahiro JIMBA 1, Takashi KOHNO 1, Hiroki NAKANO 1, Akito SHINDO 1, Makoto TAKEI 1, Shun KOHSAKA 1, Hideaki YOSHINO 1, Takeshi YAMAMOTO 1, Ken NAGAO 1, Morimasa TAKAYAMA 1
1 Tokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, Tokyo, Japan; 2 Department of Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
BACKGROUND: The circadian system influences the pathophysiology of many cardiovascular diseases; however, circadian variations in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and risk factors for in-hospital mortality between patients with daytime- versus nighttime-onset HFpEF.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 3875 consecutive patients with acute HFpEF. Daytime and nighttime periods were defined as 6:00-17:59 and 18:00-5:59, respectively. Potential prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality were selected using univariable analyses. Those with P values of <0.10 were used in multivariable logistic regression analyses with forward selection (likelihood ratios) to identify significant prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The incidence of daytime-onset HFpEF was significantly lower but the in-hospital mortality was significantly higher than that of nighttime-onset HFpEF. Independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with daytime-onset HFpEF were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.057) and systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.979). In contrast, age (OR: 1.067), coexisting atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR: 2.023), systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.989), estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR: 0.971), treatment with diuretics (OR: 0.282), and treatment with beta-blockers (OR: 0.514) were independent prognostic factors in patients with nighttime-onset HFpEF.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute HFpEF exhibits circadian variations, and onset-related differences in clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality were identified. These findings may provide new insights for future research and guide individualized patient management strategies.
KEY WORDS: Circadian clocks; Heart failure, diastolic; Mortality; Phenotype