Home > Journals > Minerva Cardiology and Angiology > Past Issues > Minerva Cardiology and Angiology 2025 April;73(2) > Minerva Cardiology and Angiology 2025 April;73(2):174-83

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Minerva Cardiology and Angiology 2025 April;73(2):174-83

DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06665-1

Copyright © 2024 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Circadian variation in patients with acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Kenichi MATSUSHITA 1, 2 , Kazumasa HARADA 1, Takahiro JIMBA 1, Takashi KOHNO 1, Hiroki NAKANO 1, Akito SHINDO 1, Makoto TAKEI 1, Shun KOHSAKA 1, Hideaki YOSHINO 1, Takeshi YAMAMOTO 1, Ken NAGAO 1, Morimasa TAKAYAMA 1

1 Tokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, Tokyo, Japan; 2 Department of Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan



BACKGROUND: The circadian system influences the pathophysiology of many cardiovascular diseases; however, circadian variations in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and risk factors for in-hospital mortality between patients with daytime- versus nighttime-onset HFpEF.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 3875 consecutive patients with acute HFpEF. Daytime and nighttime periods were defined as 6:00-17:59 and 18:00-5:59, respectively. Potential prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality were selected using univariable analyses. Those with P values of <0.10 were used in multivariable logistic regression analyses with forward selection (likelihood ratios) to identify significant prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The incidence of daytime-onset HFpEF was significantly lower but the in-hospital mortality was significantly higher than that of nighttime-onset HFpEF. Independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with daytime-onset HFpEF were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.057) and systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.979). In contrast, age (OR: 1.067), coexisting atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR: 2.023), systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.989), estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR: 0.971), treatment with diuretics (OR: 0.282), and treatment with beta-blockers (OR: 0.514) were independent prognostic factors in patients with nighttime-onset HFpEF.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute HFpEF exhibits circadian variations, and onset-related differences in clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality were identified. These findings may provide new insights for future research and guide individualized patient management strategies.


KEY WORDS: Circadian clocks; Heart failure, diastolic; Mortality; Phenotype

top of page