Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 August;81(8) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 August;81(8):865-75

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   Free accessfree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 August;81(8):865-75

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Feasibility of Post-Intensive Care Unit Clinics: an observational cohort study of two different approaches

Dettling-Ihnenfeldt D. S. 1, De Graaff A. E. 2, Nollet F. 1, Van Der Schaaf M. 1

1 Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2 Department of Intensive Care, Tergooi Hilversum, The Netherlands


PDF


BACKGROUND: Post-ICU clinics have been advocated to reduce long-term physical and psychological impairments among ICU survivors. A format for optimal structure, timing, and care content has not yet been established. We developed and implemented two post-ICU clinics in different hospital settings and evaluated the feasibility.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study ICU-survivors of a university hospital (AMC) and a general hospital (TG), who were mechanically ventilated ≥2 days and discharged to their homes, were invited to the post-ICU clinic one month after hospital discharge (AMC) or three months after ICU discharge (TG). Feasibility was evaluated as 1) the number of eligible ICU-survivors and the proportion that attended; 2) the prevalence of ICU-related abnormalities, that required referral for further treatment; and 3) patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: Forty-five of 629 AMC-patients and 70 of 142 TG-patients were eligible for the post-ICU clinic. Of these, 49% and 67% respectively, visited the outpatient clinic (P=0.026). The majority of all screened patients had functional restrictions, and 68% required referral for further diagnosis and treatment. Patient satisfaction was high.
CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable information to support the implementation of post-ICU clinics. The use of validated screening instruments facilitates the identification of patients with need for further treatment. Early in-hospital screening and recruiting patients at highest risk for adverse outcome could be a more targeted approach to achieve greater benefit.

top of page