REVIEW   Open access

Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2024 June;31(2):121-34

DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4777.24.01669-3

Copyright © 2024 THE AUTHORS

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license which allows users to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon the manuscript, as long as this is not done for commercial purposes, the user gives appropriate credits to the original author(s) and the source (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license and indicates if changes were made.

language: English

Non-A non-B aortic dissection: just for cardiac surgeons? A systematic literature review on surgical and endovascular treatment

Olga SILVESTRI ¹, Alessandra BENENATI ¹, Antonia RINALDI ¹, Luca DEL GUERCIO ¹, Raffaele SERRA ², Eduardo BOSSONE ³, Andreina CARBONE ⁴, Giulio ACCARINO ¹, Umberto M. BRACALE ¹, Davide TURCHINO ¹ ✉

¹ Department of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; ² Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; ³ Department of Public Health, Division of Cardiology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; ⁴ Unit of Cardiology, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy

INTRODUCTION: Non-A non-B dissections are fairly rare occurrences, accounting for just a small percentage of total aortic dissections. For years, treatment has been non-consensual being mostly confined to the realm of cardiac surgery. In recent times, due to the development of endovascular techniques, a procedural shift has occurred favoring less invasive vascular surgery thus precepting the need for a multidisciplinary approach and the concept of an aortic team in treating non-A non-B dissections. The aim of our study is to report on the state-of-the-art treatment of non-A non-B dissections and to determine, through a systematic review, how often an aortic team is employed in clinical practice.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A review conducted of all available PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases in accordance with PRISMA statement guidelines, analyzing all studies published between 2000 and 2023. Combined keywords referring to non-A non-B dissections and their management, and investigation of current employment of endovascular techniques in treating these dissections. Our literature search initially covered a total of 260 articles concerning surgical, endovascular and hybrid treatment. Out of these, 21 articles were selected for screening, excluding those with no mention of non-A non-B dissection and “aortic team.”
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Non-A non-B aortic dissections remain a challenging pathology with several treatment options, including endovascular, which is increasingly being employed, and can therefore be considered a valid treatment choice in aortic dissection management.
CONCLUSIONS: While guidelines mention the importance of an aortic team in treatment, no clear evidence of a multidisciplinary approach for treating non-A non-B dissection could be found in current literature.

KEY WORDS: Dissection; Operative surgical procedures; Endovascular procedures