![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |

YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
REVIEW FDG PET/CT FOR INFECTION AND INFLAMMATION: A PRACTICAL APPROACH
The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2025 March;69(1):61-8
DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.25.03612-X
Copyright © 2025 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
FDG PET/CT in vascular graft infection: a pictorial review
Manar BADARNA 1 ✉, Zohar KEIDAR 1, 2, Elite ARNON-SHELEG 3, 4
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam HealthCare Campus, Haifa, Israel; 2 Technion - the Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; 3 Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel; 4 Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
Vascular graft infections (VGI) are rare but severe complications following vascular surgery, with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnosing VGI requires a multidisciplinary approach combining clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. While CTA remains the first-line imaging modality, its limitations in detecting chronic or low-grade infections highlight the value of advanced nuclear medicine techniques, particularly [18F]FDG PET/CT. In this review, we discuss the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosing VGI, emphasizing its high sensitivity and negative predictive value, which are critical for ruling out infection. Nevertheless, there are currently no universally accepted criteria for analyzing PET/CT findings in VGI, which poses challenges for consistent interpretation and clinical decision-making. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of FDG PET/CT imaging in the context of VGI by exploring visual grading scales, uptake patterns, and semi-quantitative parameters while highlighting potential pitfalls such as post-surgical inflammation and false-positive results due to graft materials or surgical adhesives. Through a series of illustrative cases, we outline characteristic imaging patterns of infected and non-infected grafts, offering practical guidance for accurate interpretation. Additionally, we discuss the evolving role of FDG PET/CT in assessing treatment response and guiding follow-up in VGI management. This pictorial review seeks to enhance diagnostic accuracy and bridge the gap in standardized PET/CT interpretation criteria, ultimately contributing to improved patient care.
KEY WORDS: Vascular grafting; Infection; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18