![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Opzioni di pubblicazione |
eTOC |
Per abbonarsi |
Sottometti un articolo |
Segnala alla tua biblioteca |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Estratti |
Permessi |
Per citare questo articolo |
Share |

I TUOI DATI
I TUOI ORDINI
CESTINO ACQUISTI
N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
COME ORDINARE
I TUOI ABBONAMENTI
I TUOI ARTICOLI
I TUOI EBOOK
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITÀ
ORIGINAL ARTICLE CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH CHRONIC AORTIC DISSECTIONS
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2025 Apr 17
DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13310-7
Copyright © 2025 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
lingua: Inglese
Fenestrated/branched aortic endovascular repair of chronic dissections managed after previous PETTICOAT
Gabor FAZEKAS 1 ✉, Petroula NANA 1, Jose I. TORREALBA 1, Thomas LE HOUÉROU 2, Giuseppe PANUCCIO 1, Stephan HAULON 2, Tilo KÖLBEL 1
1 Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE, Hamburg, Germany; 2 Aortic Centre, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
BACKGROUND: Previous PETTICOAT stents, applied in type B aortic dissections, may complicate subsequent fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair. This study presents the technical and clinical outcomes of f/bEVAR in chronic type A and B aortic dissections previously managed with PETTICOAT.
METHODS: This case series included patients from two aortic centers, with chronic dissections managed with f/bEVAR for thoracoabdominal aneurysms following PETTICOAT. The PROCESS guidelines were followed. Technical parameters and clinical outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Eight male patients were included (63 [54-74] years). Two were managed for type I, five for type II and one for type V thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Six custom-made (two fenestrated, three branched and one combined) and two off-the-shelf branched endografts were used. Technical success was 100%. Adjunctive target vessel related procedures were performed in six cases, including pre-catheterization of stenotic renal arteries due to overlapping PETTICOAT stents, dissection flap fenestration for target vessel catheterization, in-situ fenestration after accidental celiac artery occlusion, and ballon-assisted bridging stent advancement through the PETTICOAT stent-struts. Balloon-expandable or self-expanding covered stents reinforced with balloon-expandable bare metal stents were used. No death occurred within 30 days. Two early reinterventions were performed: one relining renal bridging stent compression between the PETTICOAT stent-struts and one renal branch coiling due to bleeding. Median follow-up was 21 months. No death, reintervention or target vessel instability was detected.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the described experience, f/bEVAR may be successfully applied in patients with previous PETTICOAT by experienced hands. However, technical challenges, needing immediate intra-operative or early post-operative management, are frequent.
KEY WORDS: Aortic dissection; Aortic aneurysm, thoracoabdominal; Endovascular aneurysm repair