Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2021 February;57(1) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2021 February;57(1):92-100

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2021 February;57(1):92-100

DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06189-4

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure assessing activities and participation in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: The Cochin Spinal Stenosis 19-item questionnaire

Chiara MASI 1, 2, Gaelle COURAUD 1, 3, Camille DASTE 1, 3, 4, Jennifer JOUFFRIAULT 1, Serge POIRAUDEAU 1, 3, 4, 5, Marie-Martine LEFÈVRE-COLAU 1, 3, 4, 5, Francois RANNOU 1, 4, 6, Christelle NGUYEN 1, 4, 6

1 Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Cochin Hospital, Paris, France; 2 Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Italy; 3 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Paris, Paris, France; 4 INSERM UMR-S 1153, Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Research, University of Paris, Paris, France; 5 Federal Institute for Disability Research, Paris, France; 6 INSERM UMR-S 1124, Environmental Toxicity Laboratory, Therapeutic Targets, Cell Signaling and Biomarkers (T3S), Campus Saint-Germain-des Prés, Paris, France



BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the leading cause of spinal surgery in people over 65-years old. In people with LSS, generic self-administered questionnaires are the most commonly used PROs to assess health-related quality of life, global activity limitation, and low back pain-located activity limitation.
AIM: The aim was to develop a new patient-reported outcome measure assessing activities and participation in people with LSS.
DESIGN: Observation, prospective and qualitative study.
SETTING: For the qualitative study, were enrolled in- and outpatients with LSS from 2 French tertiary care centers (Department of PRM of Cochin Hospital and Department of Rheumatology of Limoges Hospital). For the Internet E-survey, screened the electronic medical records of the Department of PRM of Cochin Hospital.
POPULATION: From February to April 2018 were enrolled patients older than 50-years and symptomatic LSS.
METHODS: We used a 2-step approach. In a first step, we conducted a qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews in 20 patients with LSS to collect meaningful concepts and to develop a provisional questionnaire. In a second step, using the provisional questionnaire, we conducted an Internet E-survey in an independent sample of 200 patients with LSS.
RESULTS: Concepts collected from patients generated a 48-item provisional questionnaire. Overall, 63/200 (31.5%) patients completed the provisional questionnaire. Item reduction resulted in a 19-item questionnaire, the Cochin Spinal Stenosis 19-item (CSS-19) questionnaire. Principal component analysis extracted 3 factors. In confirmatory analysis, factor 1 influenced all items. We found convergent validity with low back pain, LSS-specific disability and divergent validity with mental health-related quality of life. Cronbach α coefficient (95% CI) was 0.96 (0.94; 0.97). ICC was 0.90 (0.70; 0.97). Bland and Altman analysis found no systematic trend for test-retest.
CONCLUSIONS: CSS-19 is a new patient-reported outcome measure assessing activities and participation in people with LSS. Its construction prioritized patients’ perspectives at all stages. Its content and construct validities are good.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Instruments able to capture specific needs of people with LSS in terms of activities and participation are lacking.


KEY WORDS: Lumbar stenosis, familial; Spinal stenosis; Disability evaluation

top of page