Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2015 November;55(11) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2015 November;55(11):1354-62

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  SPORT INJURIES, REHABILITATION 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2015 November;55(11):1354-62

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Trunk muscle profile in elite tennis players with and without low back pain

Grosdent S. 1, 2, Demoulin C. 1, 2, Souchet M. 1, Tomasella M. 1, 2, Crielaard J. M. 1, 2, Vanderthommen M. 1, 2

1 Department of Motricity Sciences and Rehabilitation, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium; 2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Centre of Liege, Liege, Belgium


PDF


AIM: The aim of this study was to compare tennis players with and without low back pain (LBP) and healthy sedentary participants regarding the trunk muscle strength and flexibility.
METHODS: Thirty-eight male elite tennis players and 22 healthy sedentary male students (24.8±4.0 years) participated in this investigation. Tennis players were divided into two groups: 11 players (27.8±5.5 years) with current LBP and 27 players (24.3±5.9 years) without LBP. Maximal isometric strength of trunk extensor, rotator, flexor and lateralflexor muscles was assessed by means of specific trunk dynamometers. Pelvic and lumbar flexion mobility were measured by means of inclinometer technique.
RESULTS: Comparison of tennis players with and without LBP revealed no significant difference regarding trunk muscle strength and ratio or lumbar spine flexibility (all P>0.05). In comparison with sedentary participants, the tennis players showed a sport-specific profile determined by a non-dominant trunk lateralflexors (P=0.02, F=4.05) and rotators (P=0.03, F=3.62) strength significantly higher than the dominant side.
CONCLUSION: In the current study, comparison of tennis players with and without LBP showed no significant difference regarding trunk strength and spine flexibility. Trunk profile of tennis players showed selective unilateral strength increase of the non-dominant trunk lateralflexors and rotators. This finding could result from the forehand and the service action which involves simultaneously left trunk rotators and lateralflexors, in right-handed players, to generate power. In order to confirm that trunk muscle imbalance has no influence on LBP, further studies should study the effectiveness of a programme aiming to normalize strength ratios in tennis players with LBP.

top of page