![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Opzioni di pubblicazione |
eTOC |
Per abbonarsi |
Sottometti un articolo |
Segnala alla tua biblioteca |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Estratti |
Permessi |
Per citare questo articolo |
Share |


I TUOI DATI
I TUOI ORDINI
CESTINO ACQUISTI
N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
COME ORDINARE
I TUOI ABBONAMENTI
I TUOI ARTICOLI
I TUOI EBOOK
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITÀ
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2022 June;29(2):45-51
DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4777.22.01531-5
Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
lingua: Inglese
Comparison of sutureless anastomosis with hybrid vascular graft to standard graft for the hypogastric preservation during open aortic surgery
Marco FRANCHIN 1, 2, Raffaello BELLOSTA 3, Raffaella CAVI 4, Francesca MAURI 1, 2, Luca ATTISANI 3, Matteo TOZZI 1, 2, Gabriele PIFFARETTI 1, 2 ✉
1 Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy; 2 Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ospedale di Circolo, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy; 3 Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy; 4 Unit of Pharmacy, Ospedale di Circolo, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of surgical bypass to the hypogastric artery (HA) during open surgical interventions for aortoiliac disease using the novel hybrid vascular graft (GHVG) in comparison with a standard graft.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study from tertiary referral university hospitals. Specifically for this study, post-hoc analysis identified all patients treated with open surgical aortoiliac/femoral graft reconstruction who underwent direct HA bypass, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. For this study, primary outcomes of interest were early (≤30 day) mortality, freedom from pelvic ischemic complications, and primary patency of the HA bypass.
RESULTS: The final comparative analysis included 22 patients. Standard prosthetic graft (group A) was used in 15 cases, and GHVG (group B) was used in 7. Intraoperative mortality was 0%. There was no difference in mean operative time (minutes: 310±43 vs. 332±92, P=0.641), mean blood loss (mL, 1570±915 vs. 1060±555, P=0.318), postoperative complications (OR=0.2; P=0.247), and mean hospitalization (days: 11±5 vs. 8±3, P=0.231). All patients are alive at a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 9-57). Estimated primary patency did not differ between the two groups (Log-rank, P=0.314).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, direct HA revascularization is safe using either the sutureless technique or standard graft. Despite early technical failures, which call attention to meticulous surgical technique, GHVG showed long-term results like a standard graft.
KEY WORDS: Aneurysm; Blood vessels; Anastomosis, surgical