Home > Riviste > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery > Fascicoli precedenti > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2022 June;29(2) > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2022 June;29(2):45-51

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2022 June;29(2):45-51

DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4777.22.01531-5

Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Comparison of sutureless anastomosis with hybrid vascular graft to standard graft for the hypogastric preservation during open aortic surgery

Marco FRANCHIN 1, 2, Raffaello BELLOSTA 3, Raffaella CAVI 4, Francesca MAURI 1, 2, Luca ATTISANI 3, Matteo TOZZI 1, 2, Gabriele PIFFARETTI 1, 2

1 Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy; 2 Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ospedale di Circolo, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy; 3 Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy; 4 Unit of Pharmacy, Ospedale di Circolo, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy



BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of surgical bypass to the hypogastric artery (HA) during open surgical interventions for aortoiliac disease using the novel hybrid vascular graft (GHVG) in comparison with a standard graft.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study from tertiary referral university hospitals. Specifically for this study, post-hoc analysis identified all patients treated with open surgical aortoiliac/femoral graft reconstruction who underwent direct HA bypass, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. For this study, primary outcomes of interest were early (≤30 day) mortality, freedom from pelvic ischemic complications, and primary patency of the HA bypass.
RESULTS: The final comparative analysis included 22 patients. Standard prosthetic graft (group A) was used in 15 cases, and GHVG (group B) was used in 7. Intraoperative mortality was 0%. There was no difference in mean operative time (minutes: 310±43 vs. 332±92, P=0.641), mean blood loss (mL, 1570±915 vs. 1060±555, P=0.318), postoperative complications (OR=0.2; P=0.247), and mean hospitalization (days: 11±5 vs. 8±3, P=0.231). All patients are alive at a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 9-57). Estimated primary patency did not differ between the two groups (Log-rank, P=0.314).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, direct HA revascularization is safe using either the sutureless technique or standard graft. Despite early technical failures, which call attention to meticulous surgical technique, GHVG showed long-term results like a standard graft.


KEY WORDS: Aneurysm; Blood vessels; Anastomosis, surgical

inizio pagina