Home > Riviste > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery > Fascicoli precedenti > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2019 June;26(2) > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2019 June;26(2):70-5

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2019 June;26(2):70-5

DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4777.19.01406-2

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Carotid cross-clamping intolerance during carotid endarterectomy: the role of Willis’ Circle variations

Mara FANELLI 1 , Paolo PERINI 1, Claudio BIANCHINI MASSONI 1, Alberto BRAMUCCI 1, Enrico EPIFANI 2, Matteo AZZARONE 1, Rita D'OSPINA 1, Bilal NABULSI 1, Giulia ROSSI 1, Alessandro UCCI 1, Antonio FREYRIE 1

1 Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 2 Unit of Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy



BACKGROUND: Several authors have emphasized that different anatomical features regarding the Willis Circle (CoW) may represent risk factors in the development of cerebral ischemia during carotid cross-clamping (CCC). The aim of this study is to determine if the incompleteness of CoW assessed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) represents a risk factor for CCC intolerance (CCCi) during carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA).
METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective study evaluating patients with a preoperative CTA of the extracranial and intracranial cerebral circulation, who underwent CEA under general anesthesia with preserved consciousness from 2012 to 2017. We considered patients who required shunt for CCCi (group A). We selected a control group with patient who tolerated CCC, homogenous to group A cardiovascular risk factors, contralateral carotid and vertebral arteries disease and operative technique (group B). On CTA we evaluated type (aplasia/hypoplasia) and side of the variations. Endpoints: evaluating CCCi risk in patients with at least one CoW variation; identifying the most common variation associated with CCCi. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher’s Exact Test.
RESULTS: Group A was composed by 17 patients, group B by 37. All group A patients owned at least one CoW variation vs. 70.3% of group B patients (P=0.01). The CoW variations resulted statistically significant were an aplasia/hypoplasia of contralateral anterior cerebral artery (cA1) (P=0.009) and the combination between cA1 and ipsilateral posterior communicating artery (iCoP) (P=0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: By this preliminary experience it can be assumed that CCCi is more frequently associated with an incomplete CoW. In particular aplasia/hypoplasia of cA1 alone or associated with iCoP variation is statistically correlated with CCCi.


KEY WORDS: Circle of Willis; Endarterectomy, carotid; Carotid stenosis

inizio pagina