Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2020 Jul 28

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2020 Jul 28

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11151-4

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

The accuracy of fitness watches for the measurement of heart rate and energy expenditure during moderate intensity exercise

Andrew R. JAGIM 1, 2 , Nicolas KOCH-GALLUP 3, Clayton L. CAMIC 4, Leah KROENING 2, Charles NOLTE 1, Cassidy SCHROEDER 2, Lindsay GRAN 1, Jacob L. ERICKSON 1

1 Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, WI, USA; 2 Exercise & Sport Science Department, University of Wisconsin La Crosse, La Crosse, WI USA; 3 Rockefeller Neuorscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; 4 Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA


PDF


BACKGROUND: As new technology emerges and updated fitness watches are released to the market, it is important to examine their accuracy. The aim of the current study was to examine the accuracy of three commercially available activity trackers in assessing heart rate (HR) and energy expenditure (EE) during moderate intensity exercise.
METHODS: Twenty healthy participants (Age: 20.5± 0.7 yrs., Ht: 173.4 ± 10.8 cm, BM: 72.8 ± 13.9 kg, BMI: 24.0 ± 2.5 kg/m2) wore two fitness watches (FB: Fitbit VersaTM; and PI: Polar IgniteTM) and a chest-worn HR monitor (PTP: Polar TeamPro SensorTM) during a 12-minute exercise protocol at incremental speeds. An electrocardiogram (ECG) and indirect calorimetry were used as criterion measures for HR and EE. Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was calculated to determine measurement error.
RESULTS: The MAPE values for HR were 11.6 ± 8.7% for the FB, 11.0 ± 10.0% for the PI, and 6.3 ± 5.2% for the PTP. For EE, MAPE values were 9.6 ± 7.2% for the FB, 16.7 ± 19.6% for the PI and 13.8 ± 13.0% for the PTP.
CONCLUSIONS: Fitness watches relying on optical measures of HR underestimate HR compared to criterion measures during moderate intensity exercise. Despite providing a more accurate measure of HR, a chest-worn monitor does not provide a more accurate estimate of EE compared to fitness watches. The Fitbit provided the most accurate measure of EE when compared to the Polar Ignite watch and chest-worn device.


KEY WORDS: Activity trackers; Personal fitness trackers; Heart rate; Energy metabolism

inizio pagina