Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2020 Jun 11

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2020 Jun 11

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10814-4

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Hemodynamics in young athletes following high-intensity interval or moderate-intensity continuous training

Sascha KETELHUT 1, 2 , Timo KIRCHENBERGE 2, 3, Reinhard G. KETELHUT 2, 3

1 Institute of Sports Science, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; 2 Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 3 Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany


PDF


BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on blood pressure (BP) and parameters of arterial stiffness in young athletes.
METHODS: 17 rowers (aged 16±1.4 years) were randomized into an intervention group (IG) (n=10) and the control group (CG) (n=7). During an 8-week intervention period, the IG completed a HIIT on the rowing ergometer twice weekly (2x4x2 min at ≈95% of maximum heart rate (HRmax), 60-sec rest) in addition to the regular rowing training (3x/week MICT 70-90min, ≈70% HRmax). The CG completed the regular normal rowing training and, instead of the HIIT units, two additional MICT units (70-90min, ≈70% HRmax). Before and after the intervention period, hemodynamic parameters were recorded non-invasively in both groups.
RESULTS: After the intervention period, there was a significant decrease in peripheral systolic (p = 0.01) and diastolic (p =0.05) BP, as well as in central systolic (p = 0.05) and diastolic BP (p = 0.03) in the IG. Furthermore, pulse wave velocity (p = 0.05) was significantly reduced. Analysis of intervention effects revealed significant between-group differences in central diastolic BP (p = 0.05), in augmentation pressure (p = 0.02), and in augmentation index (p
= 0.006) favoring IG. The CG showed no significant changes in the respected parameters throughout the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Already in adolescent athletes, a HIIT intervention has beneficial effects on peripheral and central BP as well as on pulse wave velocity, augmentation pressure, and augmentation index.


KEY WORDS: High-intensity interval training; Rowers; Aerobic training; Athletes; Hemodynamics

inizio pagina