Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 Jan 04

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Per citare questo articolo

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

Rivista di Medicina, Traumatologia e Psicologia dello Sport


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 Jan 04

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08105-7

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a new Taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test

Amel TAYECH 1, 2, Mohamed A. MEJRI 1, 2, Helmi CHAABENE 1, Mehdi CHAOUACHI 1, 3, David G. BEHM 4, Anis CHAOUACHI 1, 5

1 Tunisian Research Laboratory ''Sports Performance Optimization'', National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia; 2 High Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Ksar-Saïd, Manouba University, Tunis, Tunisia; 3 Movement Sport and Health Sciences Laboratory, University of Rennes 2-ENS Cachan, Rennes, France; 4 School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada; 5 AUT University, Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand


PDF  


BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the relative and absolute test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a new Taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test (TAIKT).
METHODS: Twenty Tunisian elite Taekwondo athletes participated in this study (15 males and 5 females). Participants performed the TAIKT and the Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST), twice (test and retest), on separate occasions three-week apart. Peak heart rate (HRpeak), blood lactate concentration [La־], and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during each session.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the test and retest of TAIKT and RAST for all performances and physiological variables, except for the absolute mean power (Pmean) of RAST. Test-retest results showed that the TAIKT and RAST were reliable. All TAIKT and RAST parameters had an ICC>0.90, SEM<5%, with the smallest worthwhile change slightly higher than SEM, with very small limits of concordance. Strong significant correlations were found between TAIKT and RAST parameters (Ppeak (r=0.81; r=0.70), Pmean (r=0.72; r=0.60) in (W and W·Kg-67 respectively), fatigue index (r=0.81), [La־] (r=0.89) and RPE (r=0.78) at P<0.01, and HRpeak (r=0.55, at P<0.05)).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that the TAIKT can be considered as a valid and reliable specific test for assessing anaerobic power of Taekwondo athletes.


KEY WORDS: Glycolytic system - Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test - Martial arts - Performance, Validity

inizio pagina

Publication History

Article first published online: January 4, 2018
Manuscript accepted: January 3, 2018
Manuscript revised: December 5, 2017
Manuscript received: August 29, 2017

Per citare questo articolo

Tayech A, Mejri MA, Chaabene H, Chaouachi M, Behm DG, Chaouachi A. Test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a new Taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2018 Jan 04. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08105-7

Corresponding author e-mail

anis.chaouachi@email.ati.tn