Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 Oct 31



Publication history
Per citare questo articolo


Rivista di Medicina, Traumatologia e Psicologia dello Sport

Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215



The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 Oct 31

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07910-5


lingua: Inglese

Comprehensive profile of hip, knee and ankle ranges of motion in professional football players

Alejandro LÓPEZ-VALENCIANO 1 , Francisco AYALA 1, Francisco J. VERA-GARCÍA 1, Mark de STE CROIX 2, Sergio HERNÁNDEZ-SÁNCHEZ 3, Iñaki RUIZ-PÉREZ 1, Antonio CEJUDO 4, Fernando SANTONJA 5, 6

1 Sports Research Centre, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Alicante, Spain; 2 School of Sport and Exercise, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK; 3 Department of Pathology and Surgery, Physiotherapy Area, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain; 4 Faculty of Sports Science, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain; 5 Department of Traumatology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain; 6 Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain


BACKGROUND: Limited ranges of motion (ROM) have been considered as a primary risk factor for some football injuries, but only a few studies have analysed differences in lower extremity joints. The main purposes were (a) to describe the lower extremity ROM profile in professional football players; and (b) to examine differences between goalkeepers and outfield players.
METHODS: 82 professional male football players from 4 teams were measured in the 2013 pre-season. Measures of passive hip (flexion with knee flexed [PHFKF] and extended [PHFKE], extension [PHE], abduction [PHA], external [PHER] and internal [PHIR] rotation), knee (flexion [PKF]) and ankle (dorsiflexion with knee flexed [ADFKF] and extended [ADFKE]) ROMs were taken. Magnitude-based inferences exploring differences between player position and limb were made.
RESULTS: 46% of all participants showed restricted PHFKE and/or around 30% showed restricted ADFKF ROM values. Contrarily, most players reported normal PHFKF, PHE, PHIR and PHER as well as PKF ROM scores with percentage values close to 100%. Bilateral meaningful differences for PHA, PHIR and PHER were found in approximately 30% of outfield players and goalkeepers. Statistical analysis found trivial differences between players for PHFKE, PHE, PHIR, PHER, ADFKE and ADFKF. However, moderate differences between players were found for PHFKF, PHA and PKF, with goalkeepers demonstrating higher values than outfield players.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study reinforce the necessity of prescribing exercises aimed at improving PHFKE and ADFKF ROM within everyday football training routines. In addition, as some bilateral deficits were observed, unilateral training should be considered where appropriate.

KEY WORDS: Clinical examination - Injury prevention - Sport therapy - Muscle strain

inizio pagina

Publication History

Article first published online: October 31, 2017
Manuscript accepted: October 16, 2017
Manuscript revised: October 9, 2017
Manuscript received: June 28, 2017

Per citare questo articolo

López-Valenciano A, Ayala F, Vera-García FJ, de Ste Croix M, Hernández-Sánchez S, Ruiz-Pérez I, et al. Comprehensive profile of hip, knee and ankle ranges of motion in professional football players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 31 Oct 2017. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07910-5

Corresponding author e-mail