Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 February;62(2) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 February;62(2):184-91

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 February;62(2):184-91

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12036-5

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Differences in the vertical and horizontal force-velocity profile between academy and senior professional rugby league players, and the implications for strength and speed training

Nick DOBBIN 1 , Simon CUSHMAN 2, Jon CLARKE 3, Jake BATSFORD 4, Craig TWIST 5

1 Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK; 2 Department of Sport and Public Services, Reaseheath College, Reaseheath, UK; 3 Performance Department, Rugby Football Union, Twickenham, UK; 4 Performance Department, Salford Red Devils Rugby League Football Club, Salford, UK; 5 Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Chester, Chester, UK



BACKGROUND: This study compared the vertical and horizontal force-velocity (FV) profile of academy and senior rugby league players.
METHODS: Nineteen senior and twenty academy players from one professional club participated in this study. The vertical FV profile was determined using a series of loaded squat jumps (0.4 to 80 kg) with jump height recorded. The horizontal FV profile involved a 30-m over-ground sprint with split times recorded at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 m. Theoretical maximal force (F0), velocity (V0) and power (Pmax), optimal F0 and V0, and activity specific variables (e.g., vertical FV imbalance) were determined.
RESULTS: Absolute F0 and Pmax from the vertical and horizontal profile were moderately different between groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.64-1.20, P<0.001-0.026), whilst for V0, differences were small (SMD=0.33-0.41, P=0.149-0.283). Differences in relative F0, Pmax and optimal F0 during both assessments were trivial to moderate (SMD=0.03-0.82, P=0.021-0.907).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate senior and academy players present with different FV profiles and highlight some potential developmental opportunities for senior and academy rugby league players that sport scientists, strength and conditioning and rugby coaches can implement when designing programmes and considering long-term athlete development.


KEY WORDS: Sports; Team sports; Exercise

inizio pagina