Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2019 April;59(4) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2019 April;59(4):632-9

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  BODY COMPOSITION, NUTRITION AND SUPPLEMENTATION 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2019 April;59(4):632-9

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08505-5

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Validity of electrical impedance myography to estimate percent body fat: comparison to bio-electrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Cody R. van RASSEL 1, Nicole A. BEWSKI 1, Erin K. O’LOUGHLIN 2, 3, Alicia WRIGHT 4, Daniel P. SCHEEL 5, Lucila PUIG 5, Lisa KAKINAMI 4, 5

1 Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; 2 INDI Department, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 3 Hospital Research Center of Montreal University (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada; 4 PERFORM Center, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 5 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada



BACKGROUND: Assessment of percent body fat (%BF) is typically measured with bioelectrical impedance (BIA) as a proxy for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Notably, poorer agreement between BIA and DXA among persons who are overweight or obese has been reported. The use of electrical impedance myography (EIM) as a proxy for DXA has not been validated. The objective was to evaluate an EIM device and two multi-frequency BIA devices with the reference standard (DXA) stratified by weight status and gender.
METHODS: In a convenience sample of 82 adults, %BF assessed by EIM and two BIA devices was compared to DXA. Agreement between devices was tested with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: Agreement between DXA and EIM (ICC=0.77) was poorer than the agreement between either BIA device with DXA (ICC>0.87). Stratified by sex, agreement between EIM and DXA was greater for men than women (ICC=0.81 and ICC=0.61, respectively). Stratified by BMI, agreement between EIM and DXA was best for normal-weight individuals (ICC=0.89) and progressively poorer for overweight (ICC=0.80) and obese (ICC=0.67) individuals. Bland-Altman plots revealed wide limits of agreement and an increase in EIM mean difference as average %BF increased. Similar trends were seen in BIA assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: EIM and BIA substantially underestimate %BF in overweight and obese individuals. Wide limits of agreement coupled with variable ICC limit device interchangeability with one another and limit clinical utility.


KEY WORDS: Body composition - Electric impedance - Photon absorptiometry - Adipose tissue - Myography

inizio pagina