Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 July-August;58(7-8) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 July-August;58(7-8):1078-89



Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca


Publication history
Per citare questo articolo



The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 July-August;58(7-8):1078-89

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07070-0


lingua: Inglese

Neck strength and self-reported neck dysfunction: what is the impact of a season of Rugby Union?

Danielle M. SALMON 1 , S. John SULLIVAN 2, Phil HANDCOCK 1, Nancy J. REHRER 1, Brian NIVEN 3

1 School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; 2 Center for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; 3 Center for the Application of Statistics and Mathematics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand


BACKGROUND: Neck strength has been reported to reduce the incidence of concussions and neck injuries. However, little is known about how neck strength changes over a playing season. The aim of this study was to understand the impact a 20-week rugby season has on neck strength, neck pain (NP) and neck stiffness (NS) in a cohort of rugby players, relative to a non-contact control group.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study employed a fixed-frame dynamometer to measure neck strength in a simulated contact posture in rugby players (N.=32) and controls (N.=15). During each assessment, participants performed a single maximal voluntary contraction in extension, flexion, left (LtFlx) and right lateral flexion (RtFlx). To quantify neck dysfunction, “current,” “average,” and “worst” NP and NS were measured using visual analogue scales.
RESULTS: Post-season improvements (35.3-59.1 N) in neck strength were observed for the forwards for all measured directions (P<0.01), and were significant when compared to controls. For the backs, improvements were seen in extension, flexion and LtFlx (P=0.01-0.05), with only extension (29.8 N) and flexion (35.14 N) remaining significant when contrasted against the controls. The controls’ neck strength remained unchanged over the season. Despite improvements in peak force, NP increased (all three measures) for the forwards (P=0.01-0.04), while only current (P=0.03) and worst NP (P=0.04) increased for the backs. Unexpectedly, NS remained unchanged for the forwards, while backs reported increases for all three measures (P=0.01-0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: A season of rugby resulted in neck strength adaptations in the rugby players. Despite these improvements, increased levels of NP and NS were reported.

KEY WORDS: Neck muscles - Muscle strength - Football - Neck pain - Neck stiffness

inizio pagina