Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 December;57(12) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 December;57(12):1549-56

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

Rivista di Medicina, Traumatologia e Psicologia dello Sport


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 December;57(12):1549-56

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06751-7

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Physical and physiological differences of backs and forwards from the Brazilian National rugby union team

Fábio Y. NAKAMURA 1, 2 , Lucas A. PEREIRA 1, José E. MORAES 3, Ronaldo KOBAL 1, Katia KITAMURA 1, Cesar C. CAL ABAD 1, Luís M. TEIXEIRA VAZ 4, Irineu LOTURCO 1

1 NAR, Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; 2 State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil; 3 Brazilian Rugby Confederation, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; 4 University Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal


PDF  


BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare backs and forwards rugby union players recruited to a National team in the following physical and physiological indicators: anthropometrics, squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), 10- and 30-meter sprint, resting heart rate variability (HRV), Yo-Yo Test and heart rate (HR) at 2 minutes of test.
METHODS: The measurements were performed on the first day of a training camp planned to finely select the players who would participate in the 2016 America’s Rugby Championship. The magnitude-based inference was used in the comparisons.
RESULTS: Backs demonstrated almost certainly greater distance in the Yo-Yo Test (backs: 2305.9±231.3 meters; forwards: 1802.4±361.2 meters), higher vertical jump height in both SJ and CMJ (SJ: 44.0±5.3 cm vs. 37.6±5.4 cm; CMJ: 46.1±5.0 cm vs. 40.0±5.5 cm, for backs and forwards respectively), and superior sprint velocity in 10- and 30-m (10-m: 6.02±0.23 m.s-1 vs. 5.51±0.34 m.s-1; 30-m: 7.46±0.25 m.s-1 vs. 6.89±0.37 m.s-1, for backs and forwards respectively) than the forwards. In contrast, forwards were almost certainly taller and heavier than backs, and displayed higher sprint momentum in 10- and 30-meters (10 meters: 513.0±51.6 kg.m.s-1 vs. 598.4±53.1 kg.m.s-1; 30 meters: 635.3±56.1 kg.m.s-1 vs. 749.0±70.5 kg.m.s-1, for backs and forwards respectively). The submaximal HR in the first 2-minutes of the Yo-Yo test was likely lower in the backs than in the forwards (77.6±5.1% of the maximal HR vs. 81.3±5.4% of the maximal HR for backs and forwards respectively), while HRV indices were not different between backs and forwards.
CONCLUSIONS: Playing position appears to be determined by the players’ physical and physiological characteristics in top-level rugby union, and the submaximal HR measured during Yo-Yo test can be a simple alternative to discriminate backs and forwards.


KEY WORDS: Football - Physiology - Athletic performance

inizio pagina

Publication History

Issue published online: October 20, 2017
Article first published online: November 4, 2016
Manuscript accepted: October 18, 2016
Manuscript revised: October 7, 2016
Manuscript received: June 2, 2016

Per citare questo articolo

Corresponding author e-mail

fabioy_nakamura@yahoo.com.br