Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 March;56(3) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 March;56(3):206-13

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Per citare questo articolo

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

Rivista di Medicina, Traumatologia e Psicologia dello Sport


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 March;56(3):206-13

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Generic and sport-specific reactive agility tests assess different qualities in court-based team sport athletes

Aaron T. SCANLAN 1, 2, Neal WEN 1, 3, Andrew P. KIDCAFF 1, Daniel M. BERKELMANS 1, Patrick S. TUCKER 1, 2, Vincent J. DALBO 1, 2

1 Human Exercise and Training Laboratory, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia; 2 Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia; 3 Australian Basketball Digest Institute, Melbourne, Australia


PDF  


BACKGROUND: Comparisons between reactive agility tests incorporating generic and sport-specific stimuli have been performed only in field-based team sports. The aim of this study was to compare generic (light-based) and sport-specific (live opponent) reactive agility tests in court-based team sport athletes.
METHODS: Twelve semi-professional male basketball players (age: 25.9±6.7 yr; stature: 188.9±7.9 cm; body mass: 97.4±16.1 kg; predicted maximal oxygen uptake: 49.5±5.3 mL/kg7min) completed multiple trials of a Reactive Agility Test containing light-based (RAT-Light) and opponent-based stimuli (RAT-Opponent). Multiple outcome measures were collected during the RAT-Light (agility time and total time) and RAT-Opponent (decision time and total time).
RESULTS: Mean performance times during the RAT-Light (2.233±0.224 s) were significantly (P<0.001) slower than during the RAT-Opponent (1.726±0.178 s). Further, a small relationship was observed between RAT-Light agility time and RAT-Opponent decision time (r10=0.20), while a trivial relationship was apparent between total performance times across tests (r10=0.02). Low commonality was observed between comparable measures across tests (R2=0-4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Reactive agility tests containing light-based and live opponent stimuli appear to measure different qualities in court-based team sport athletes. Court-based team sport coaches and conditioning professionals should not use generic and sport-specific reactive agility tests interchangeably during athlete assessments.

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Scanlan AT, Wen N, Kidcaff AP, Berkelmans DM, Tucker PS, Dalbo VJ. Generic and sport-specific reactive agility tests assess different qualities in court-based team sport athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016 March;56(3):206-13. 

Corresponding author e-mail

a.scanlan@cqu.edu.au