Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2003 March;43(1) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2003 March;43(1):51-6

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi PROMO
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Permessi

 

Original articles  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2003 March;43(1):51-6

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Influence of the base-line determination on work efficiency during submaximal cycling

Hintzy-Cloutier F. 1, Zameziati K. 2, Belli A. 2

1 Laboratoire de Modélisation des Activités Sportives Bourget du Lac, France 2 Laboratoire de Physiologie, GIP Exercice St. Etienne, France


PDF


Aim. The pur­pose of ­this ­study was to com­pare ­work effi­ciency ­values (WE = ­work accom­plished/­energy expen­di­ture ­above exer­cising ­with 0 ­load) ­among dif­ferent ­unloaded ­base-­line cor­rec­tion tech­niques for dif­ferent ­power out­puts.
­Methods. ­Twelve ­healthy men per­formed 6 5-min ­steady-­state exer­cises of 0 (­unloaded), 40, 80, 120, 160 and 200 W at a ped­alling ­rate of 90 rpm on a ­cycle ergom­eter. ­Three dif­ferent ­unloaded ­base-­line cor­rec­tions ­were ­used for WE cal­cu­la­tion: an ­actual meas­ure­ment of V.O2 cor­re­sponding to the ­unloaded ped­alling exer­cise, the y-inter­cept ­value of the ­linear regres­sion ­between V.O2 and ­power ­output and the y-inter­cept ­value of the cur­vi­linear V.O2-­power regres­sion.
­Results. The ­present ­study dem­on­strated ­that WE was sig­nif­i­cantly ­higher ­when deter­mined ­using the ­actual meas­ure­ment of the ­unloaded V.O2 ­than y-inter­cept ­values of the ­linear (p<0.001) and cur­vi­linear (p<0.05) V.O2-­power regres­sions. WE ­based on theo­ret­ical deter­mi­na­tions (­linear vs cur­vi­linear regres­sions) ­were not sig­nif­i­cantly dif­ferent. The ­power ­output sig­nif­i­cantly ­affected all WE ­index, ­with ­higher WE ­being meas­ured ­when the ­power ­output was low and ­lower WE ­when ­power ­output was ­high.
Con­clu­sion. The ­high WE ­values deter­mined ­using the ­actual V.O2 meas­ure­ment ­could be ­explained by (i) the addi­tional ­energy ­expended to stab­ilise the ­body in addi­tion to the ­energy expen­di­ture of ­moving the ­lower ­limbs ­without ­power pro­duc­tion and by (ii) the dif­fi­culty to experi­men­tally repro­duce the ­unloaded con­di­tion. The ­large ­range of WE ­values meas­ured in the ­present ­study is due to dif­fer­ences in the pro­ce­dures ­used to deter­mine the ­unloaded V.O2 (and ­thus dif­fer­ences in ­unloaded V.O2 ­values) as ­well as dif­fer­ences in the ­cycling inten­sities.

inizio pagina