Home > Riviste > Panminerva Medica > Fascicoli precedenti > Panminerva Medica 2022 June;64(2) > Panminerva Medica 2022 June;64(2):200-7

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

REVIEW  HOT TOPICS IN HUMAN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: PERFECTING THE ART OF ART Free accessfree

Panminerva Medica 2022 June;64(2):200-7

DOI: 10.23736/S0031-0808.22.04686-9

Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Taking a closer look at the key performance indicators in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory: a guide for reproductive professionals

Kelly A. WIRKA 1, Israel MALDONADO ROSAS 2, Christina ANAGNOSTOPOULOU 3, Neha SINGH 4, Madhumitha MANOHARAN 5, Bruna BARROS 6, Sofia I. LEONARDI DIAZ 7, Nivita GUGNANI 8, Dimple DESAI 9, Florence BOITRELLE 10, 11, Hassan N. SALLAM 12, Ashok AGARWAL 13

1 Unit of Fertility and Endocrinology, EMD Serono, New York, NY, USA; 2 Citmer Reproductive Medicine, IVF LAB, Mexico City, Mexico; 3 Unit of Reproductive Medicine - Embryo ART, Lito Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece; 4 NOVA IVF, Gorakhpur, India; 5 AlphaLife Fertility and Women’s Center, Salem, India; 6 Huntington Medicina Reprodutiva, São Paulo, Brazil; 7 Hospital Publico Materno Infantil, Salta, Argentina; 8 Milann - The Fertility Center, New Delhi, India; 9 Dpu IVF and Endoscopy Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Hospital and Research Center, Pune, India; 10 Unit of Reproductive Biology, Fertility Preservation, Andrology, CECOS, Hospital of Poissy, Poissy, France; 11 Department of Biology, Reproduction, Epigenetics, Environment and Development, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Paris Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France; 12 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt; 13 American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA



Over the years, laboratories performing assisted reproductive technologies have been tasked with a growing number of procedures of increased complexity. New technologies, including hardware and software innovations, are constantly evolving, and evaluated as potential tools to improve laboratory and clinical outcomes. The assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratory plays a crucial role in fertility treatments and, therefore, it is often under intense scrutiny with regards to performance and success rates. As the reproductive medicine field strives to deliver improved clinical outcomes to patients, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics - including the ART laboratories - are required to monitor their performance and seek improvement in the many different aspects related to patient care. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and benchmarking are important tools to support performance monitoring and quality improvement processes. The concept and potential benefits of KPI utilization is generally accepted. However, its adoption poses some challenges that may discourage ART practices from pursuing it as part of their quality management systems (QMS). Properly selecting and using KPIs will allow laboratories to successfully manage their performance and set up realistic target goals to consistently deliver high rates. Existing literature can guide reproductive medicine professionals to embark on their journey to successfully select, implement, and manage KPI and benchmarking as part of their ART programs. This article discusses the concept and essentials of KPI and benchmarking applied to the ART laboratory, as well as potential challenges and how to overcome them.


KEY WORDS: Reproductive techniques, assisted; Oocytes; Spermatozoa

inizio pagina