Home > Riviste > Panminerva Medica > Fascicoli precedenti > Panminerva Medica 2012 December;54(1 Suppl 4) > Panminerva Medica 2012 December;54(1 Suppl 4):53-8

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Permessi

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Panminerva Medica 2012 December;54(1 Suppl 4):53-8

Copyright © 2012 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Guanine-based purines modulate the effect of L-NAME on learning and memory in rats

Giuliani P. 1, Buccella S. 1, Ballerini P. 2, Ciccarelli R. 1, D’alimonte I. 1, Cicchitti S. 1, Petragnani N. 1, Natale S. 1, Iacovella G. 1, Caciagli F. 1, Di Iorio P. 1

1 Department of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; 2 Department of Psychologic, Humanities and Territorial Sciences,, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy


PDF


Guanosine has been reported to exert neuroprotective effects. We recently reported that, following intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection to rats, it resulted to be widely distributed. Its metabolic product guanine also rapidly increased in all the tissues, including brain, after i.p. injection of guanosine and consistently we found a significant enzymatic activity of a soluble purine nucleoside phosphorylase in the plasma of the treated animals.
In this study the effect of per os administration of guanosine or guanine to rats submitted to passive avoidance task has been evaluated. Guanosine (4 and 8 mg/kg) administered pretraining impaired retention in the passive avoidance task and was unable to prevent the amnesic effect caused by 100 mg/kg N-omega-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) known to reduce the capability of treated animals to acquire or retain informations in several learning tasks. On the contrary, guanine (4 and 8 mg/kg), which per se did not modify the latency to step-trough in the passive avoidance task, when administered pretraining 15 min before L-NAME prevented, in a dose dependent manner, the amnesic effect of the NOS inihibitor. Moreover the nucleobase was able to rescue the memory trace also when administered after training. Neither guanosine nor guanine had effects on locomotor activity. These results indicate that guanine can exert important biological activities which may be different from those mediated by its precursor guanosine, thus this evenience should be taken into account when the biological effects of guanosine are evaluated.

inizio pagina