Home > Riviste > Otorinolaringologia > Fascicoli precedenti > Otorinolaringologia 2019 March;69(1) > Otorinolaringologia 2019 March;69(1):21-5

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Otorinolaringologia 2019 March;69(1):21-5

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-6621.18.02193-8

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Cochlear implant in elderly deaf patients with adverse predictors of audiological outcome

Andrea CANALE 1 , Francesca SANTAGATA 2, Massimiliano MASSAIA 2, Federico CARANZANO 1, Valeria BOGGIO 1, Andrea ALBERA 1, Fernando C. GERVASIO 1, Michelangelo LACILLA 1, Roberto ALBERA 1

1 Department of Ear Nose and Throat, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 2 Department of Geriatrics, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy



BACKGROUND: Auditory rehabilitation of elderly cochlear implant recipients represents a clinical challenge considering aging-associate mental decline in association with duration, onset and grade of hearing loss. The aim of the study was to determine whether elderly patients (>65 years) with severe post-lingual hearing loss and negative prognostic factors would benefit from cochlear implant.
METHODS: Cognitive performance (via a battery of 12 neuropsychological tests), speech recognition scores, and hearing benefit were evaluated before cochlear implant and after 6 months in a group of 10 geriatric patients (>65 years) with at least one of the following adverse prognostic factors: age >80 years, auditory deprivation >10 years, postlingual hearing loss onset in childhood, with a duration of moderate-to-severe hearing loss >50 years.
RESULTS: Mean speech recognition score was 55% after cochlear implant and the improvement was independent of age, sex, and cognitive performance. At the 6-month cognitive evaluation, the scores on 11 of the 12 neuropsychological tests showed improvements over baseline. The mean Mini Mental State Examination showed a statistically significant difference (P=0.02) and lower scores at baseline were predictive for higher scores at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: A lower mean speech recognition score as compared with published data was observed. An improvement in hearing benefit and neuropsychological test scores is shared by previous reports. The new finding is that such improvement can be obtained even in a selected group of older patients with adverse prognostic factors of audiological outcome.


KEY WORDS: Cochlear implants - Cochlear implantation - Aged - Persons with hearing impairments - Correction of hearing impairment - Hearing loss

inizio pagina