Home > Riviste > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging > Fascicoli precedenti > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017 September;61(3) > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017 September;61(3):331-9

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi PROMO
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017 September;61(3):331-9

DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.17.02760-1

Copyright © 2014 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Discrepant salivary gland response after radioiodine and MIBG therapies

Walter JENTZEN , Marion RICHTER, Thorsten D. POEPPEL, Jochen SCHMITZ, Wolfgang BRANDAU, Andreas BOCKISCH, Ina BINSE

Nuclear Medicine Clinic, Duisburg-Essen University, Essen, Germany


PDF


BACKGROUND: A retrospective study using PET/CT imaging with 124I-labeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (124I-MIBG) was performed to estimate the (radiation) absorbed dose to the salivary glands in neuroendocrine cancer patients undergoing 131I-MIBG therapy and to compare these results with those in radioiodine (131I-iodide) therapy.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients received individual 124I-MIBG-PET/CT dosimetries, among whom 18 had not previously undergone any MIBG therapies (patient group before treatment) and 9 had already received MIBG therapies prior to the tracer dosimetries (patient group after treatment). For each patient, three or four 124I-MIBG PET/CT scans were performed at approximately 4 and 24 hours, as well as at approximately 48 or/and ≥96 hours after tracer injection. The absorbed doses per administered 131I-MIBG activity to the submandibular and parotid glands were calculated based on the MIRD concept, with its assumption of a uniform glandular activity distribution.
RESULTS: The mean±standard deviation of the (self-)absorbed dose per activity averaged over both patient groups and salivary gland types was 0.53±0.24 Gy/GBq (median, 0.49 Gy/GBq; range, 0.17-1.38 Gy/GBq). The absorbed doses per activity of the patient group before treatment did not significantly deviate from those of the patient group after treatment (P=0.67). In the patient group after treatment, the mean±standard deviation of the cumulative 131I-MIBG activity was 20±12 GBq (median, 16 GBq; range, 10-50 GBq). Among the patient groups, no significant absorbed dose difference was found between the submandibular and parotid glands (P>0.24). In comparison to radioiodine therapy, the estimated absorbed dose per activity in MIBG was significantly higher (P<0.001), on average twice as high, contradicting the relationship between the absorbed dose and clinical observation of glandular side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: The discrepant salivary gland responses in MIBG and radioiodine therapies suggest a different radiotherapeutical distribution on microscopic scale within the glandular tissue and prove the clinical relevance of a microdosimetric analysis.


KEY WORDS: Salivary glands - Positron-emission tomography - Neuroendocrine tumors

inizio pagina