![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Opzioni di pubblicazione |
eTOC |
Per abbonarsi |
Sottometti un articolo |
Segnala alla tua biblioteca |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Estratti |
Permessi |
Per citare questo articolo |
Share |


I TUOI DATI
I TUOI ORDINI
CESTINO ACQUISTI
N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
COME ORDINARE
I TUOI ABBONAMENTI
I TUOI ARTICOLI
I TUOI EBOOK
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITÀ
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020 December;64(6):537-43
DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.17.04187-X
Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
lingua: Inglese
Negative influence of preoperative tinnitus on hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery
Luciano MASTRONARDI 1, 2 ✉, Guglielmo CACCIOTTI 1, Raffaellino ROPERTO 1, Ettore DI SCIPIO 3
1 Division of Neurosurgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy; 2 Unit of Neurophysiopathology, ASL-Roma 1, Rome, Italy; 3 Department of Neurosurgery, The State Education Institute of Higher Professional Training, The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University under the Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia
BACKGROUND: Goals of vestibular schwannoma (VS) microsurgery are maximal resection, facial nerve (FN) preservation and in selected cases, hearing preservation (HP). Postoperative HP rates are related to clinical and radiographic factors: size of tumor, preoperative hearing, hypertension, diabetes, and presence or absence of preoperative tinnitus. In this retrospective review we evaluated the influence of preoperative tinnitus on HP after VS surgery in patients with preoperative socially useful hearing (SUH).
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with SUH underwent VS micro neurosurgery by retrosigmoid (RS) approach. Selection criteria were pure tone audiogram ≤50dB loss and speech discrimination score >50% (50/50 criterion, AAO-HNS class A-B). In relation to maximum diameter, we identified two size-groups: 1) group A ≤2cm (13 cases); 2) group B >2cm (12 cases). HP attempt was assisted by intraoperative ABR evoked by LS CE-Chirp® (Interacustics, Middelfart, Denmark) acoustic stimuli.
RESULTS: Mean age was 44.3 years (20-64); average maximum diameter 2,0cm (0,8-4). Preoperative tinnitus was present in 10 patients (40%): all of them had a Class B-hearing. Total and nearly-total (>95%) resection was possible in all. Mortality and major morbidity were zero. In all, facial nerve (FN) was anatomically and functionally preserved; in 10 an incomplete FN deficit was followed by complete recovery within 2-8 weeks. At a follow-up ranging from 8 to 17 months (average 12.7 months), socially useful hearing (SUH) preservation rate was 52%, with significant differences in relation to size: 61.5% group A and 41.7% group B (P=0.014). Postoperative AAO-HNS C (serviceable) hearing was observed in 36%, deafness in 12%. At last follow-up, among the 10 patients with preoperative tinnitus 6 worsened from Class-B to Class-C, 3 remained in Class-B, and one was deaf. As regards SUH preservation, 3 of 10 patients with preoperative tinnitus and 10 of 15 without it remained in Class-A-B (P=0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgery represents the first therapeutic option for small growing VS with SUH. Our data confirm that key-hole RS removal of VS with intraoperative LS-CE-Chirp ABR monitoring allows good rate of SUH preservation, especially maximum diameter does not exceed 2cm. Preoperative tinnitus seems to indicate a lower hearing reserve and predicts a lower likelihood of HP.
KEY WORDS: Neuroma, acoustic; Hearing; Tinnitus; Neuroma, acoustic