Home > Riviste > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Fascicoli precedenti > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2016 September;60(3) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2016 September;60(3):357-66

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi PROMO
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Per citare questo articolo

 

REVIEWS   

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2016 September;60(3):357-66

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases

Hanno M. SPECHT 1, Stephanie E. COMBS 1, 2, 3

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; 2 Institut of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleißheim, Germany; 3 German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (dktk), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany


PDF


Brain metastases are a common problem in solid malignancies and still represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality. With the ongoing improvement in systemic therapies, the expectations on the efficacy of brain metastases directed treatment options are growing. As local therapies against brain metastases continue to evolve, treatment patterns have shifted from a palliative “one-treatment-fits-all” towards an individualized, patient adapted approach. In this article we review the evidence for stereotactic radiation treatment based on the current literature. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a local high precision approach for the primary treatment of asymptomatic brain metastases has gained wide acceptance. It leads to lasting tumor control with only minor side effects compared to whole brain radiotherapy, since there is only little dose delivered to the healthy brain. The same holds true for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for large metastases or for lesions close to organs at risk (e.g. the brainstem). New treatment indications such as neoadjuvant SRS followed by surgical resection or postoperative local therapy to the resection cavity show promising data and are also highlighted in this manuscript. With the evolution of local treatment options, optimal patient selection becomes more and more crucial. This article aims to aid decision making by outlining prognostic factors, treatment techniques and indications and common dose prescriptions.

inizio pagina