Home > Riviste > Minerva Urology and Nephrology > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 April;72(2) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 April;72(2):135-43



Opzioni di pubblicazione
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca


Publication history
Per citare questo articolo


REVIEW   Free accessfree

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 April;72(2):135-43

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03585-9


lingua: Inglese

Role of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density as biomarkers for medical and surgical treatment response in men with lower urinary tract symptoms

Giovanni CORONA 1, Matteo SALVI 2, Arcangelo SEBASTIANELLI 2, Riccardo BOSSA 2, Linda VIGNOZZI 3, Mario MAGGI 3, Cosimo DE NUNZIO 4, Sergio SERNI 2, Christian GRATZKE 5, Stavros GRAVAS 6, Mauro GACCI 2

1 Department of Endocrinology/Andrology, Maggiore Carlo Alberto Pizzardi Hospital, Bologna, Italy; 2 Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 3 Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Endocrinology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 4 Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy; 5 Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Bavaria-Munich, Germany; 6 Department of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece

INTRODUCTION: Prostate specific antigen and Prostate specific antigen-density are used for the initial evaluation of patient with LUTS due to benign prostatic enlargement in order to discriminate between benign conditions and prostate cancer. Conversely, the role of these markers during the follow up of benign prostatic enlargement patients is still unclear. The aim of our study is to evaluate the role of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density as outcome parameter for both medical and surgical treatment in patients with male LUTS.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis based on data from clinical trials evaluating the clinical effect of medical or surgical therapy on LUTS/benign prostatic enlargement. Meta-regression analyses were done to evaluate the effects of several factors on IPSS score improvement.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We selected 12 studies out of 433, including data on 1959 patients. Both medical and surgical treatment lead to a significant reduction of PSA levels as compared to baseline (P<0.001). However, after medical treatment, lower PSA values are associated with more significant improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms as measured with the IPSS, while after surgery (P<0.05), the recovery of urinary function does not correlate with the decline in PSA values (P=0.59). After medical treatment, the improvement in LUTS correlate with a decline of PSAD, while the opposite holds true in men treated with surgery (both: P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PSAD may represent an objective treatment outcome parameter and should be evaluated during the follow up of men treated for LUTS due to BPE as marker of treatment response.

KEY WORDS: Prostatic hyperplasia; Prostate-specific antigen; Lower urinary symptoms

inizio pagina