Home > Riviste > Minerva Urology and Nephrology > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 October;71(5) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 October;71(5):537-43

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 October;71(5):537-43

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03432-5

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Robotic pyelolithotomy for the treatment of large renal stones: a single-center experience

Michele ZAZZARA 1 , Giuseppe CARDO 1, Giovanni PAGLIARULO 1, Arjan NAZARAJ 1, Francesco P. MASELLI 1, Cosimo DE NUNZIO 2, Marcello SCARCIA 1, Michele ROMANO 1, Filippo PORTOGHESE 1, Giuseppe M. LUDOVICO 1

1 Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; 2 Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy



BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported robotic pyelolithotomy (RPL) series; furthermore, the most of all have reported small and single-center series. Herein we report our experience from 70 cases of complex kidney stones treated with RPL at our surgical center; this study reports the largest series of RPL in a minimal invasive experienced center.
METHODS: Between February 2016 and March 2018, 70 patients with complex renal stones (Guy’s Stone Score: 4) underwent RPL and included in a prospectively maintained institutional database. Baseline characteristics, clinical data, perioperative data, postoperative data and stone free status were assessed by descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Of 70 patients, 72.85% presented renal pelvis stones. The mean maximum stone diameter was 33.1±14.5 mm (median 30 mm; interquartile range 22-40 mm). Mean total operative duration was 122.5±34.4 min (median 120 min; interquartile range 105-135 min). In two patients (2.8%), a grade III complications were noted; no major complications (grade IV-V) were noted. The complete SFR, after a single robotic procedure, was 92.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that RPL is a safe, reproducible and minimally invasive approach as treatment of large renal stones when endoscopic treatment failed or was not available. RPL permits to achieve an excellent stone free status, in a single definitive procedure


KEY WORDS: Kidney calculi; Robotic surgical procedures; Urolithiasis

inizio pagina