Home > Riviste > Minerva Urology and Nephrology > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 August;71(4) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 August;71(4):395-405



Opzioni di pubblicazione
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca


Publication history
Per citare questo articolo


ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 August;71(4):395-405

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03210-1


lingua: Inglese

Risk factors and prognostic implications for pathologic upstaging to T3a after partial nephrectomy

Alp T. BEKSAC 1, David J. PAULUCCI 1, Zeynep GUL 1, Balaji N. REDDY 1, Muthumeena KANNAPPAN 1, Alberto MARTINI 1, John P. SFAKIANOS 1, Greg E. GIN 2, Ronney ABAZA 3, Daniel D. EUN 4, Akshay BHANDARI 5, Ashok K. HEMAL 6, James PORTER 7, Ketan K. BADANI 1

1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 2 Department of Urology, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA; 3 Department of Urology, Ohio Health Dublin Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; 4 Department of Urology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 5 Division of Urology, Columbia University at Mount Sinai, Miami Beach, FL, USA; 6 Department of Urology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 7 Department of Urology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

BACKGROUND: Performing partial nephrectomy (PN) on a cT1 tumor, which postoperatively is upgraded to pT3a can possibly lead to compromise of cancer specific mortality. We therefore aimed to identify risk factors for pathologic T3a upstaging of cT1 tumors and to analyze the association between upstaging, positive surgical margins (PSM) and overall survival (OS).
METHODS: The present study included patients who underwent PN for a clinically localized T1 renal mass from two datasets: 1) 1298 patients from a prospectively maintained multi-center database (MCDB); and 2) 7940 patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable logistic regression models within each cohort were used to identify predictors of cT1 to pT3a upstaging and its association with PSM. Cox proportion hazards regression models were used to compare overall survival in the NCDB cohort.
RESULTS: The rate of pT3a upstaging was 5.7% (N.=74) in the MCDB and 1.9% (N.=156) in the NCDB cohort. Older age (MCDB OR=1.04, P=0.001; NCDB OR=1.04, P=0.001) and larger tumor size (MCDB OR=1.89, P<0.001; NCDB OR=1.38, P<0.001) increased the likelihood of upstaging. PSM was found to be more likely for pT3a upstaged patients in both cohorts (MCDB 14.9% vs. 3.5%, P<0.001; NCDB 14.8% vs. 8.3%, P=0.006), even when adjusting for tumor size. At short term follow-up (NCDB median follow-up 27.3 months), pT3a upstaging was associated with worse OS in univariable (HR=1.89; 95% CI=1.00, 3.55; P=0.049) but not multivariable analysis (HR=1.63; 95% CI=0.86, 3.08; P=0.131). OS was 93.0% vs. 95.8% at 3 years for those with and without pT3a upstaging, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger tumor size and increased age are associated with pathological upstaging to T3a for clinical T1 tumors treated with partial nephrectomy. Steps to improve identification of occult pT3a disease are necessary as its occurrence significantly increased the likelihood of a PSM, both in a high-volume multicenter cohort, as well as, a national data registry.

KEY WORDS: Carcinoma, renal cell; Nephrectomy; Risk factors; Survival

inizio pagina