Home > Riviste > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 May 07



Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca


Publication history
Per citare questo articolo



Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2019 May 07

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03426-X


lingua: Inglese

The efficacy and safety of string stents after retrograde intrarenal surgery for urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Athanasios DELLIS 1, 2, Panagiotis KALLIDONIS 3 , Constantinos ADAMOU 3, Nikolaos KOSTAKOPOULOS 4, Dimitrios KOTSIRIS 3, Panteleeimon NTASIOTIS 3, Athanasios G. PAPATSORIS 4,, Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU)

1 2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Academic Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 2 1st Department of Urology, Laikon General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 3 Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece; 4 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, School of Medcine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece


INTRODUCTION: Ureteral stent insertion is frequently chosen after upper tract endourological procedures. The use of stents carrying a suture string is sometimes used to facilitate the extraction of the stent. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to provide stronger evidence for the efficacy of string stents, by comparing them to non-string stents, in matters of patients’ Quality of Life (QoL), stent-related symptoms (SRS) and complications.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane, EMBASE and Web of Science. The studies included were only comparative randomized controlled trials which included at least one group with tethered ureteral stent and one group with standard stent after the performance of endoscopic surgery for lithiasis of upper urinary tract. Secondary end-points included complications such as stent migration, stent dislodgement, urinary tract infections (UTIs), emergency room (ER) visits and retained stent.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 9 studies to be included in the qualitative synthesis and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be included in the quantitative synthesis and the meta-analysis. The statistical difference in the stent related QoL was insignificant. General health was less affected in the non-string group. The urinary symptoms and the impact on work performance were similar between the groups. VAS pain score during the time that the patients were stented was insignificantly less in the non-string group, while VAS pain score was higher in the non-string group at extraction. Stent dislodgement was more frequent in the string group. There was no difference between the groups concerning the rate of UTIs.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-string stents affected less the patients’ QoL, in terms of general health and urinary symptoms, caused less stent related pain in cases of stent in situ and caused stent dislodgment in fewer patients. On the contrary, string stents caused less pain at extraction. All the aforementioned differences did not reach statistical difference.

KEY WORDS: Urolithiasis - Ureteral stents - String-stents - Stone disease

inizio pagina