Home > Riviste > Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Ginecologica 2020 December;72(6) > Minerva Ginecologica 2020 December;72(6):413-9

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Minerva Ginecologica 2020 December;72(6):413-9

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04587-6

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

High grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive biopsy: the importance of accurate pre-operative workup

Cecilia BUSSANI 1 , Francesca MALENTACCHI 1, Karin L. ANDERSSON 2, Massimiliano FAMBRINI 1, Chiara COCO 1, Dora PAVONE 1, Giulia FANTAPPIÈ 1, Irene TURRINI 1, Valeria DUBINI 2, Felice PETRAGLIA 1, Flavia SORBI 1

1 Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 2 Colposcopy Service, Toscana Centro Unit of Local Health, USL 3, Palagi Hospital, Florence, Italy



BACKGROUND: In cervical cancer screening programs, women with abnormal cytology and confirmation by biopsy are referred for colposcopy for histological evaluation.
METHODS: We characterized the presence and the genotype of HPV by Linear Array HPV genotyping assay in cytological samples collected from about 400 women undergoing conization, with reported high CIN grade after biopsy.
RESULTS: The most prevalent genotype was HPV 16, with an increasing presence depending on the severity of the CIN and with the highest incidence in the 26-35 age range. In the group of younger women (<25) we found the highest percentage of CIN3 (39.3%) and the lowest of CIN1 (17.9%). An increase of CIN1 with increasing age was observed. A different distribution of HPV presence was observed depending on CIN grade (P<0.001): CIN1 HPV negative samples were 46.3%, CIN2: 5.8% and CIN3: 1.4%. Interesting, in the analyzed cohort, we observed the presence of 30% of CIN1. Moreover, within CIN1, 85% of them were associated to negative HPV detection, this observation suggested that the detection of HPV presence may be useful to identify low CIN grade that should be reconsidered for surgical treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest implementing the protocol for the management of women with high risk precancer lesions, with a further HPV test before surgical treatment. The evaluation of HPV presence and genotype before conization might represent a useful tool in reducing or postpone the conization treatment.


KEY WORDS: Papillomaviridae; Genotype; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

inizio pagina