![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Opzioni di pubblicazione |
eTOC |
Per abbonarsi |
Sottometti un articolo |
Segnala alla tua biblioteca |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Estratti |
Permessi |
Per citare questo articolo |
Share |


I TUOI DATI
I TUOI ORDINI
CESTINO ACQUISTI
N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
COME ORDINARE
I TUOI ABBONAMENTI
I TUOI ARTICOLI
I TUOI EBOOK
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITÀ
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Minerva Stomatologica 2019 December;68(6):303-7
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04311-5
Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
lingua: Inglese
Xerostomia: prevention with Pycnogenol® supplementation: a pilot study
Gianni BELCARO 1, 2 ✉, M. Rosaria CESARONE 1, 2, Umberto CORNELLI 1, 2, Claudia SCIPIONE 1, 2, Valeria SCIPIONE 1, 2, Mark DUGALL 1, 2, Shu HU 1, 2, Beatrice FERAGALLI 1, 2, Morio HOSOI 1, 2, Claudia MAIONE 1, 2, Roberto COTELLESE 1, 2, Paola CESINARO DI ROCCO 1, 2
1 Irvine3 Labs, Department of Medical and Oral Sciences and Biotechnologies, G. d’Annunzio University, Pescara, Italy; 2 International Agency for Pharma-Standard Supplements (IA-PSS), Pescara, Italy
BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot study was the evaluation of primary, idiopathic mucosal dryness (xerostomia or dry mouth) in subjects without cancer.
METHODS: A group of non-diabetic subjects and a group of diabetics were managed with standard management (SM) or with SM+Pycnogenol® (150 mg/day) for 2 weeks.
RESULTS: In total, 48 subjects were included in the study; 24 diabetics and 24 non-diabetics. 12 diabetics and 12 non-diabetics took Pycnogenol® and 12 diabetics and 12 non-diabetics were followed up with standard management only and served as controls. No side effects and no tolerability problems were observed with Pycnogenol®. The registry groups were comparable for characteristics and symptoms at baseline. All otherwise healthy subjects had a BMI<26 kg/m2. In 2 weeks, salivary flow and oxidative stress improved significantly in both groups of subjects (non-diabetics and diabetics) with 150 mg/day Pycnogenol® (P<0.05), while minimal improvements in salivary flow were seen with SM. The subjective score and the number of mucosal breaks and ulcerations, all minimal (<1 mm in length or diameter), were significantly decreased with Pycnogenol® supplementation (P<0.05) with minimal variations in the SM controls. Finally, the mean lysozyme level in parotid saliva samples was significantly increased in the Pycnogenol® group (P<0.05) both in diabetics and non-diabetics.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary results, Pycnogenol® could be a new, valid option for the treatment of xerostomia.
KEY WORDS: Xerostomia; Pycnogenols; Saliva; Diabetes; Oxidative stress