Home > Riviste > Minerva Biotechnology and Biomolecular Research > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Biotecnologica 2015 December;27(4) > Minerva Biotecnologica 2015 December;27(4):215-7

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi PROMO
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Minerva Biotecnologica 2015 December;27(4):215-7

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Importance of various combined testing methods for red urine, white blood cells analysis

Huang B. 1, Tian L. 1, Zou H. 2, Fang D. 1

1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xuzhou Children’s Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China; 2 Department of General Surgery, Xuzhou Children’s Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China


PDF


AIM: The aim of this paper was to explore the importance of combined using of dry chemical method, dreg analyzer, and anti-BMA urine dreg to red cells and white cells testing in urine.
METHODS: As for the urine samples of 600 patients, they were tested with urine dreg analysis, dry chemical analysis, and microscope microscopic analysis and the results were compared.
RESULTS: The positive proportion of the testing results of dry chemical analysis, manual urine dreg cystourethroscopy method, urine dreg analysis, white blood cells (WBCs) tested positive were 25.2%, 31.2%, and 33.5%, while that of red blood cells (RBCs) were 43.2%, 33.0%, and 35.2%. The difference between dry chemical method and two kinds of sediment cytourethroscopy method had statistical significance (P<0.01), and the difference between two kinds of sediment cystourethroscopy method did not have statistical significance (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The joint application of urine dreg analyzer, dry chemical method, and microscopy microscopic contributes to improve the detection accuracy.

inizio pagina