Home > Riviste > Minerva Anestesiologica > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 Jan 12

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 Jan 12

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.15067-3

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Future in regional anesthesia and pain medicine: neuropathic pain and robotic limbs

Giovanni DI PINO 1, Valeria PIOMBINO 1, Massimiliano CARASSITI 2, Max ORTIZ-CATALAN 3, 4, 5, 6

1 Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy; 2 Unit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy; 3 Center for Bionics and Pain Research, Mölndal, Sweden; 4 Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden; 5 Operational Area 3, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; 6 Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden


PDF


Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) is a dysesthesic painful sensations perceived in the lost limb, resulting from complex interactions between structural and functional nervous systems changes. We analyse its main pathogenetic models and speculate on candidate therapeutic targets. The neuroma model considers PLP to arise from spontaneous activity of residual limb injured axons. Other peripheral-origin models attribute PLP to damage of somatosensory receptors or vascular changes. According to the cortical remapping model, the loss of bidirectional nervous flow and the need to enhance alternative functions trigger reorganisation and arm and face skin afferents “invade” the hand territory. On the contrary, the persistent representation model suggests that continued inputs preserve the lost limb representation and that, instead to a shrinkage, PLP is associated with larger representation and stronger cortical activity. In the neuromatrix model, the mismatch between body representation, which remains intact despite limb amputation, and real body appearance generates pain. Another hypothesis is that proprioceptive memories associate specific limb positions with pre-amputation pain and may be recalled by those positions. Finally, the stochastic entanglement model offers a direct relationship between cortical reorganization and pain. Amputation disrupts motor and somatosensory circuits, allowing for maladaptive wiring with pain circuits and causing pain without nociception. Relief of PLP depends solely on motor and somatosensory circuitry engagement, making anthropomorphic visual feedback dispensable. Existing and apparently contradicting theories might not be mutually exclusive. All of them involve several intertwined potential mechanisms by which replacing the amputated limb by an artificial one would counteract PLP.


KEY WORDS: Phantom limb pain; Pathophysiology; Brain plasticity; Body representation; Stochastic entanglement; Hand
prostheses

inizio pagina