Home > Riviste > Minerva Anestesiologica > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > Minerva Anestesiologica 2020 Feb 17

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2020 Feb 17

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14272-X

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Neuromuscular monitoring using TOF-Cuff® versus TOF-Scan®: an observational study under clinical anesthesia conditions

Andrew MARKLE 1, Nicole GRAF 2, Katja HORN 1, JoEllen WELTER 1, Alexander DULLENKOPF 1

1 Institute for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland; 2 Graf Biostatistics, Winterthur, Switzerland


PDF


BACKGROUND: Anesthesia guidelines advise objective neuromuscular monitoring. Acceleromyography, the standard technique used in clinical practice, is commonly used with the train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation pattern. Objective of this study was to compare the performance of two devices, TOF-Scan® and TOF-Cuff®.
METHODS: This prospective, controlled observational study included patients undergoing surgery in general anesthesia with the need of neuromuscular blockade. Both neuromuscular monitoring devices were simultaneously placed on individual patients. Atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) was administered once. Main outcome measure was return time to TOF ratio ≥ 90%, secondary outcomes were time to TOF-ratio of 0% (during induction) and time to recovery to TOF-count of 2. Results from the two devices were compared by Bland-Altman plots and one-sample t-test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Mean time to recovery to TOF ratio ≥ 90% was 79.6 min (±13.6) for TOF-Scan® and 70.8 min (±12.8) for TOF-Cuff® (p <0.001; mean bias 8.9 min, 95% CI 5.8 - 12.0). Mean time to TOF-ratio 0% was 164.6 s (±38.8) for TOF-Scan® and 145.5 s (±44.6) for TOF-Cuff® (p <0.001; mean bias 19.1 s, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 10.0 - 28.2). Mean time to recovery to TOF count 2 was 52.8 min (±12.5) for TOF-Scan® and 45.5 min (±11.1) for TOF- Cuff® (p <0.001; mean bias 7.3 min, 95% CI 4.3 - 10.2).
CONCLUSIONS: TOF-Cuff® consistently recorded the endpoints earlier than TOF-Scan®. Despite large intra-individual variations found with both devices, these results could be meaningful in a clinical setting.


KEY WORDS: Neuromuscular block; Patient monitoring; Patient safety; General anesthesia

inizio pagina