Home > Riviste > Minerva Anestesiologica > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 March;87(3) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 March;87(3):294-301

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 March;87(3):294-301

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14734-5

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Comparison of dynamic needle tip positioning versus conventional long-axis in-plane techniques for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization: a randomized controlled trial

Seohee LEE 1, Jee-Eun CHANG 2, Yoomin OH 1, 2, Hyo-Jun YANG 1, 2, Jinyoung BAE 1, Youn-Joung CHO 1, Yunseok JEON 1, Karam NAM 1, Tae-Kyong KIM 2

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; 2 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea



BACKGROUND: Continuous visualization of the needle tip is essential for successful ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization, and the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique enables it. The aim of this randomized, dual-center trial was to compare the first-attempt success rate of ultrasound-guided internal jugular catheterization between the DNTP and conventional long-axis in-plane (LAX-IP) techniques.
METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery at two tertiary teaching hospitals were randomly allocated to either the DNTP or LAX-IP group. Internal jugular venous catheterization was performed by four anesthesiologists. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of central venous catheterization. Procedural time and complications related to catheterization were compared as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: In total, 142 patients were analysed. The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in the DNTP group (59/72, 81.9%) than in the LAX-IP group (46/70, 65.7%; odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval 1.09-5.15; P=0.028). In addition, the needle was redirected less frequently in the DNTP group than the LAX-IP group (P=0.026). Procedural time was comparable between the groups. No significant differences were observed in complications related to catheterization, including posterior wall puncture, carotid artery puncture, or hematoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The DNTP technique resulted in a significantly higher success rate on the first attempt at internal jugular venous catheterization and required less frequent redirection of the needle during the procedure than the conventional LAX-IP technique.


KEY WORDS: Cardiac surgical procedures; Catheterization, central venous; Complications; Ultrasonography

inizio pagina