Home > Riviste > Minerva Anestesiologica > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Anestesiologica 2019 November;85(11) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2019 November;85(11):1168-74

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Freefree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2019 November;85(11):1168-74

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13530-4

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

The incidence of intraoperative gastric tube malposition verified by Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Luis E. TOLLINCHE 1 , Duan LI 2, Lucia SALAMANCA-CARDONA 1, Kay S. TAN 3, David O’CONNOR 1, Howard TENG 1, Gloria YANG 1, Michael LONG 4, Cindy B. YEOH 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Marian University, Indianapolis, IN, USA



BACKGROUND: Over a million gastric tubes are placed yearly for varying medical reasons including gastric decompression. In the operating room (OR), this is performed blindly, and position is confirmed by auscultation, aspiration, or palpation by a surgeon. Despite the known risks of malpositioned gastric tubes, there is limited data in anesthesia literature about the incidence of intraoperative malpositioned gastric tubes. In this study, we use Point-of-Care ultrasonography (POCUS) to confirm gastric tube placement in the OR.
METHODS: Prospective observational study with a total of 149 subjects, all over 18 years of age, undergoing surgery with general endotracheal anesthesia and intraoperative blind placement of a gastric tube by an anesthesia provider. The primary objective of this study is to determine the incidence of malposition of blindly placed gastric tubes.
RESULTS: In our analysis, we found that out of 149 patients 110 patients were successfully visualized; the incidence of malposition was 0.14 [95% CI: 0.08-0.21]. We did not find age, Body Mass Index, or sex to be associated with predisposing patients to intraoperative malposition of gastric tube. However, increasing years of experience of anesthesia provider correlated with higher malposition rates.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we demonstrated that the incidence of malposition of blindly gastric tubes was 14%. Given the attendant risks of malpositioned gastric tubes, this data should inform decision algorithms for the blind placement of gastric tubes.


KEY WORDS: Point-of-care systems; Anesthesia, general; Ultrasonography; Algorithms; Patient safety; Prospective studies

inizio pagina