Home > Riviste > Minerva Anestesiologica > Fascicoli precedenti > Minerva Anestesiologica 2019 July;85(7) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2019 July;85(7):731-7



Opzioni di pubblicazione
Per abbonarsi PROMO
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca


Publication history
Per citare questo articolo


ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2019 July;85(7):731-7

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13078-1


lingua: Inglese

Postoperative pain after vitreo-retinal surgery is influenced by surgery duration and anesthesia conduction

Beatrice LORIGA 1, Alessandro DI FILIPPO 1 , Lorenzo TOFANI 2, Patrizia SIGNORINI 1, Tomaso CAPOROSSI 3, Francesco BARCA 3, Angelo R. DE GAUDIO 3, Stanislao RIZZO 3, Chiara ADEMBRI 1

1 Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 2 Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research, and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 3 Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

BACKGROUND: The control of postoperative pain (POP) is a key component of perioperative care. POP after vitreo-retinal surgery (VRS) has been under-investigated, and its incidence remains elusive.
METHODS: In order to assess POP after VRS, the associated risk factors and efficacy of the analgesic protocol in use at our institution, we made a one-year retrospective study on patients undergoing VRS. Patients aged >18 years, ASA Class I-III undergoing VRS entered the study. POP was evaluated by measuring a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and analgesic consumption.
RESULTS: A total of 782 patients entered the study. Patients received locoregional (LRA) or general anesthesia (GA) with supplemental block. Twenty-two percent of patients needed analgesics (acetaminophen in 97% of cases), mostly between two and six hours after surgery. The univariate analysis showed a positive association between POP and duration of surgery (P<0.0001) and glaucoma (P=0.04), and a negative association with age (P=0.008), analgesic administration at the end of surgery (P=0.005) and the intraoperative administration of remifentanil for surgery under LRA (P=0.02); sedation to execute the block for LRA did not reduce POP. Patients treated with GA with supplemental block had less pain compared to those treated with LRA with/without remifentanil (P=0.03, P=0.002, respectively). The multivariate analysis confirmed a positive correlation between POP and duration of surgery (P=0.0007) and a negative correlation with the intraoperative remifentanil administration during LRA (P=0.04), and with GA with supplemental block (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of POP after VRS is low but not absent, especially for long procedures, it does not require postoperative opioids and can be modified by anesthesiologic choices.

KEY WORDS: Postoperative pain; Pain management; Ophthalmologic surgical procedures; Vitrectomy

inizio pagina