Home > Riviste > International Angiology > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > International Angiology 2021 Oct 21

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi PROMO
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

 

International Angiology 2021 Oct 21

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04724-6

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Profiling abdominal aortic aneurysm growth with three-dimensional ultrasound

Magdalena BRODA 1, 2 , Laurence ROUET 3, Alexander ZIELINSKI 1, 2, Henrik SILLESEN 1, 2, Jonas EIBERG 1, 2, 4, Qasam GHULAM 1

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3 Philips Research, Suresnes, France; 4 Copenhagen Academy of Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark


PDF


BACKGROUND: “Profiling” is a new method based on three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) allowing for direct comparison of baseline and follow-up diameters along the AAA length. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of profiling to visualize AAA changes at sub-maximum diameters, and to categorize the growth profiles.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively and consecutively included patients under AAA surveillance at a tertiary referral centre. 3D-US images of AAAs at baseline and at one-year follow-up were segmented, generating a centerline and a mesh of the aneurysm geometry. The mesh was processed to illustrate diameter changes of a given AAA. Three growth profiles were identified: A) Peak Growth: the largest, significant (≥3.6 mm) diameter difference occurred within a 10 mm margin to either side of the maximum baseline diameter; B) Edge Growth: at least one significant diameter difference and the criteria for Peak Growth did not apply; C) No Growth: all diameter differences were nonsignificant. A centerline length of ≥60 mm was assumed to capture a comparable segment of the wall geometry at baseline and follow-up. Cohen’s kappa and Kaplan Meier analysis were used to analyze data.
RESULTS: In total, 186 patients had growth profiles generated. Of these, 28 (15%) were discarded, mainly based on inadequate centerline lengths (n= 21, 11.3%). The remaining patients were categorized into Edge Growth (n=83, 52%), No Growth (n=47, 30%), and Peak Growth (n=28, 18%).
CONCLUSIONS: Profiling interprets AAA growth at sub-maximum diameters. Half of the cohort had Edge Growth. These AAAs risk being classified as stable.


KEY WORDS: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Growth; Ultrasonography; Diagnostic imaging; Imaging; Three-dimensional

inizio pagina