Home > Riviste > International Angiology > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > International Angiology 2020 Apr 14

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

 

International Angiology 2020 Apr 14

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04321-7

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Effect of thromboprophylaxis on the incidence of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Yu-Dong LI 1, Shu-Xin ZHANG 2

1 Department of Proctology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; 2 Department of Proctology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China



INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the role of thromboprophylaxis in venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgical patients.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature search was conducted in electronic databases and studies (randomized controlled trials, or prospective / retrospective cohorts) were selected if they reported the incidence of VTE in CRC patients who underwent any type of open or laparoscopic surgery. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain pooled incidence estimates; or odds ratios (OR) of incidence between prophylaxis and no-prophylaxis groups; or between VTE and non-VTE patients to identify risk factors.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four studies (804,003 patients) were included. Prophylaxis was performed mainly with low molecular weight heparins. Odds of VTE were significantly lower in prophylactic than in non-prophylactic patients (OR 0.42 [95%CI: 0.28, 0.63]; p˂0.00001). Incidence of radiological and symptomatic VTE in patients with prophylaxis was 9.7% [95%CI: 8.6, 10.8] and 1.3% [95%CI: 0.7, 2.0] respectively. Odds of bleeding were higher in patients with prophylaxis (OR: 3.37 [95% CI: 1.05, 10.8]; p=0.04). Incidence of bleeding in patients with and without prophylaxis was 4.3% [95% CI: 3.2, 5.4] and 1.2% [95% CI: 0.02, 2.4] respectively. Operative time, anesthesia duration, and hospital stay were longer in patients with VTE. Obesity, disseminated cancer, chemotherapy, steroid use, emergency case status, advanced stage cancer, hypoalbuminemia, postoperative infection/sepsis, and history of VTE are identified as important risk factors for VTE incidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis reduces the incidence of VTE in CRC surgical patients but may increase the chances of bleeding. Several risk factors can influence VTE incidence.


KEY WORDS: Prophylaxis; Thromboembolism; Colorectal cancer; Deep vein thrombosis; Surgery

inizio pagina