Home > Riviste > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche > Fascicoli precedenti > Gazzetta Medica Italiana - Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2021 November;180(11) > Gazzetta Medica Italiana - Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2021 November;180(11):715-21

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Gazzetta Medica Italiana - Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2021 November;180(11):715-21

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-3660.20.04543-X

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Walking versus cycling test: physiological responses in normobaric hypoxia

Nicola GIOVANELLI 1, 2 , Alessandro CIGALOTTO 3, Barbara LESA 1, 2, Stefano LAZZER 1, 2

1 School of Sport Science, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; 2 Center for Mountain Sports Studies, University of Udine, Gemona del Friuli, Udine, Italy; 3 Ambulatorio Medicina di Montagna, University Hospital Friuli Centrale, Gemona del Friuli, Udine, Italy



BACKGROUND: Races that take place in the mountains cover a variety of terrains at several altitudes. A test for predicting acute mountain sickness has been developed on the basis of a “normal” population but not on the basis of an athlete population. The aim of this study was to compare the Richalet Test to a specific test for athletes.
METHODS: Eleven subjects (age: 29.7±8.9 years, V̇O2peak: 55.7±8.5 mL/kg/min) underwent two incremental tests on a cycle ergometer (CE) and treadmill (TR). Then, they underwent two tests on the CE and TR composed of: 1) five minutes of rest in normoxia; 2) five minutes of rest in hypoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen (11.5%); 3) five minutes of walking or cycling at an intensity of 80% of the respiratory compensation point in hypoxia; and 4) five minutes of rest in normoxia. We compared the following parameters at rest and during exercise: desaturation, ventilatory and cardiac response.
RESULTS: None of the mean values of the investigated parameters differed between the two tests (P>0.05), but some subjects who had out-of-range values on the CE did not have out-of-range values on the TR (or vice versa).
CONCLUSIONS: We showed that there were: 1) no differences in the mean values of the analyzed parameters between the two protocols; and 2) that the responses to the CE and TR protocols varied across individuals. For individuals who are planning to hike or run at a high altitude they should undergo a walking test. Additionally, when athletes plan to compete at high altitudes, the intensity of the test should be similar to that planned for the race.


KEY WORDS: Altitude; Endurance training; Running

inizio pagina