Home > Riviste > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche > Fascicoli precedenti > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2016 December;175(12) > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2016 December;175(12):542-50

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi PROMO
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2016 December;175(12):542-50

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Injury risk factor analysis of elite athletes in training environment: a comparative survey between Germany and Taiwan

Victor C. WANG 1, Frank MAYER 1, Pia M. WIPPERT 2

1 Department of Sport Medicine and Sport Orthopedics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany; 2 Department of Sociology of Physical Activity and Health, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany


PDF


BACKGROUND: Injury can be a devastating setback for elite athletes whereby injury prevention plays a key role in the biography of athletes. This study had three aims: 1) to compare if there are differences between German and Taiwan elite athletes in injury-related factors; 2) to evaluate the influence of these factors to injury frequency; and 3) to identify possible interactions within injury-related factors and the injury risk for both cohorts.
METHODS: A total of 335 elite athletes (269 Taiwanese athletes: 121 F, 148 M, mean age 23.2±6.9; 66 German athletes: 32 F, 34 M, mean age=26.0±7.6) participated. Inclusion criterion: current or retired national team members of Olympic sports. A risk of injury questionnaire (Risk-IQ) for elite athletes was used. Scores were calculated for individual scales/subscales for analysis. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, Spearman correlation, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA tests were employed. Generalized linear models for multivariate regression of scales/subscales were used. Significance was set for P<0.05.
RESULTS: Hypothesis 1: the results of medical care, environment, training, stress, and injury caused losses factors tested significantly different (all P<0.05) between German and Taiwanese cohorts. Hypothesis 2: regardless of nationality, the injury contributing factors were: age, sport types, experience levels, medical care, cardiovascular problem, training and stress (all P<0.05). Hypothesis 3: The interaction effect existed between sport type_format, injury caused losses and medical care.
CONCLUSIONS: Injury-related influencing factors and interactions can be found via multi-disciplines integrated Risk-IQ regardless of heterogeneous recruitment. The top 5 injury risk factors were: 1) experience level (international competition); 2) number of periodic health examination and pre-participation evaluation received; 3) sport types; 4) stress from life events; 5) age.

inizio pagina