Home > Riviste > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Fascicoli precedenti > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2018 October;54(5) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2018 October;54(5):792-6

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

SPECIAL ARTICLE   Freefree

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2018 October;54(5):792-6

DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05462-X

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Basic bibliometrics for dummies and others: an overview of some journal-level indicators in physical and rehabilitation medicine

Franco FRANCHIGNONI 1 , Levent ÖZÇAKAR 2, Stefano NEGRINI 3, 4

1 Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy; 2 Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey; 3 Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 4 IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi, Milan, Italy



This report aims to complement and update a series of papers published in the last decade on bibliometrics regarding journals related to physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM). It targets clinicians and researchers (academic and non-academic) in our discipline who would like to use bibliometric indicators as a complementary “tool” to integrate into their expert practice of journal evaluation. Different journal-based metrics are analysed in order to provide a wide (albeit general) view of the performance of top PRM journals. First, we provide some brief preliminary remarks useful for an informed understanding of our results: 1) an update on bibliometric indicators and multidisciplinary databases of peer-reviewed literature; 2) the meaning of some bibliometric indicators; 3) the practical message related to this report: “keep it simple.” Then, we profile the performance of 22 PRM core journals, according to six widely used bibliometric indicators. Indicators are grouped into three categories defined by their quartile classification (Three Star: top quartile; Two Star: second upper quartile; One Star: under the median). In conclusion, bibliometrics is just one of the key methods used for measuring the (supposed) ‘impact’ of scholarly publications and it represents only a raw proxy for the real impact or value of the research. This report wishes to add a small contribution for a simplified understanding of journal-level indicators in PRM, to support informed decisions on which high-level journals merit special attention by clinicians and researchers working in our discipline.


KEY WORDS: Physical and rehabilitation medicine - Bibliometrics - Publishing - Journal Impact Factors

inizio pagina