Home > Riviste > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Fascicoli precedenti > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2018 October;54(5) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2018 October;54(5):690-7



Opzioni di pubblicazione
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca


Publication history
Per citare questo articolo


ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2018 October;54(5):690-7

DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.04962-6


lingua: Inglese

The degree of arm elevation impacts the endurance and cardiopulmonary adaptations of COPD patients performing upper-limb exercise: a cross-over study

Mara PANERONI 1 , Carla SIMONELLI 1, Pierantonio LAVENEZIANA 2, 3, Massimiliano GOBBO 4, Manuela SALERI 1, Luca BIANCHI 1, Michele VITACCA 1

1 Istituti Clinici Maugeri, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy; 2 Division of Experimental and Clinical Respiratory Neurophysiology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France; 3 Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix Hospital Group, Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles de la Respiration, de l’Exercice et de la Dyspnée (Département “R3S”, Pôle Pragues), Paris, France; 4 Department of Physiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

BACKGROUND: In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), upper limb exercise is widely recommended. However, how the degree of shoulder flexion may influence the exercise response is unknown.
AIM: We compared metabolic, ventilatory and symptomatic responses during constant-load supported and unsupported exercise performed at 80° and 120° arm elevation.
DESIGN: Randomized cross-over study.
SETTING: Pulmonary Pathophysiology Service in an Italian Respiratory Rehabilitative Division, in-patients were enrolled.
METHODS: Twelve patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (FEV1 51%, BMI 26.7 ± 6.3 Kg/m2) performed 4 symptom-limited constant-load tests at 70% of their individual maximal workload: 2 supported and 2 unsupported, respectively at 80° and 120° of glenohumeral joint flexion, executed in a random order.
RESULTS: Time to exhaustion (Tlim), evaluated by Kaplan-Maier curve, was shorter at 120° than 80° arm elevation in both supported (360 vs.. 486 seconds, p=0.031) and unsupported exercise (210 vs.. 375 seconds, p=0.005). No difference in dynamic hyperinflation was found between 80° and 120° elevation, even at the peak of exercise and at iso-ventilation. When normalized to Tlim, 120° arm elevation had a significantly higher metabolic cost, heart rate, minute ventilation and dyspnea/fatigue symptoms compared to 80° elevation, both in unsupported and supported conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: A larger shoulder flexion shortens per se exercise endurance due to the increased metabolic, ventilatory and cardiac response, without worsening dynamic hyperinflation.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Arm position should be considered when prescribing individual exercise training and may be adjusted to modulate the workload.

KEY WORDS: Exercise - Exercise test - Physical therapy modalities - Arm

inizio pagina