Home > Riviste > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia > Fascicoli precedenti > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2019 August;154(4) > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2019 August;154(4):379-85

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Freefree

Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2019 August;154(4):379-85

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-0488.18.05863-7

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Reflectance confocal microscopy features of thin versus thick melanomas

Agnieszka KARDYNAL 1, Małgorzata OLSZEWSKA 2, Nathalie de CARVALHO 3, Irena WALECKA 1, Giovanni PELLACANI 3, Lidia RUDNICKA 2

1 Department of Dermatology, CSK MSWiA, Warsaw, Poland; 2 Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland; 3 Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy



BACKGROUND: In-vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) plays an increasingly important role in differential diagnosis of melanoma. The aim of the study was to assess typical confocal features of thin (≤1 mm according to Breslow index) versus thick (>1mm) melanomas.
METHODS: Thirty patients with histopathologically confirmed cutaneous melanoma were included in the study. RCM was performed with Vivascope equipment prior to excision. Fifteen melanomas were thin (Breslow thickness ≤1 mm) and 15 were thick (Breslow thickness >1 mm).
RESULTS: In the RCM examination, the following features were more frequently observed in thin compared to thick melanomas: edged papillae (26.7% vs. 0%, P=0.032) and areas with honeycomb or cobblestone pattern (33.3% vs. 6.7%, P=0.068). Both features are present in benign melanocytic lesions, so in melanoma are good prognostic factors. The group of thick melanomas compared to the group of thin melanomas in the RCM images presented with greater frequency of roundish cells (100% vs. 40%, P=0.001), non-edged papillae (100% vs. 60%, P=0.006), numerous pagetoid cells (73.3% vs. 33.3%, P=0.028), numerous atypical cells at dermal-epidermal junction (53.3% vs. 20%, P=0.058) and epidermal disarray (93.3% vs. 66.7%, P=0.068).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive imaging methods helps in deepening of knowledge about the evolution and biology of melanoma. The most characteristic features for thin melanomas in confocal examination are: fragments of cobblestone or honeycomb pattern and edged papillae (as good prognostic factors). The features of thick melanomas in RCM examination are: roundish cells, non-edged papillae, numerous pagetoid cells at dermal-epidermal junction and epidermal disarray.


KEY WORDS: Melanoma; Microscopy, confocal; Diagnostic techniques and procedures

inizio pagina