Home > Riviste > Chirurgia > Fascicoli precedenti > Chirurgia 2020 February;33(1) > Chirurgia 2020 February;33(1):18-23

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Chirurgia 2020 February;33(1):18-23

DOI: 10.23736/S0394-9508.19.04958-1

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Evaluation of shear strength in metallic brackets bonded to ceramic surface

Patricia C. LIMA SANDOVAL 1, Anna C. RATTO TEMPESTINI HORLIANA 2, Fernanda CALABRÓ CALHEIROS 3, Cacio de MOURA-NETTO 4, Flavia GONÇALVES 3, Ana M. ANTUNES SANTOS 1, 3 , Anna C. VOLPI MELLO-MOURA 3, 5

1 Department of Operative Dentistry of Santa Cecília University (UNISANTA), Santos, Brazil; 2 Department of Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil; 3 Department of Biodentistry, Ibirapuera University (UNIB), São Paulo, Brazil; 4 Department of Dentistry, Cruzeiro do Sul University, São Paulo, Brazil; 5 Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Research and Clinical Center of Dental Trauma in Primary Teeth, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo - FOUSP, São Paulo, Brazil



BACKGROUND: Brackets adhesion in ceramic surfaces has increasing relevance because adults, who usually have ceramic prostheses, are requiring orthodontic treatment. Evaluate the shear strength using different adhesive protocols in metal brackets bounded to ceramic surfaces and the remaining resin index (ARI) after its removal.
METHODS: Sixty cylinders were manufactured in metal and ceramic and divided into: G1 - hydrofluoric acid + 10% silane; G2 - blasting with aluminum oxide + silane; G3 - hydrofluoric acid 10% + Single Bond Universal and G4 - blasting with aluminum oxide + Single Bond Universal. After thermal cycling, the samples were submitted to shear bond strength test. The ceramic surfaces were then classified by ARI. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: The average shear strengths were: G1 = 24.2 MPa; G2 = 21.3 MPa; G3 = G4 = 19.1 MPa to 14.2 MPa. There were differences between all groups (P<0.05) except for G3 (P>0.05). Regarding to ARI, there was no difference among groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Single Bond Universal treated with blasting aluminum oxide had the best performance, and promoted good shear strength, it caused less cohesive damage to the ceramic.


KEY WORDS: Shear strength; Orthodontic brackets; Ceramics

inizio pagina