Home > Riviste > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2020 February;61(1) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2020 February;61(1):24-36

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo

 

REVIEW  FEVAR FOR JUXTARENAL RECONSTRUCTION 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2020 February;61(1):24-36

DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11187-1

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

The role of fEVAR, chEVAR and open repair in treatment of juxtarenal aneurysms: a systematic review

Igor B. KONČAR 1, 2 , Aleksa L. JOVANOVIĆ 2, 3, Stefan M. DUČIČ 1

1 Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Center, Belgrade, Serbia; 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 3 Institute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia



INTRODUCTION: Open repair (OR), fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) and endovascular exclusion using parallel graft (chEVAR) are complementary procedures used for treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (jrAAA). The aim of our study was to assess available literature and analyze dispersion of OR, fEVAR and chEVAR procedures among reported papers related to treatment of jrAAA.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The PubMed database was systematically searched using predefined strategy and key words related to treatment of jrAAA on September 28th, 2019. Studies were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria with at least five patients treated with at least one of the procedures while systematic reviews, meta-analysis, reviews, comments, editorials and letters were excluded as well as studies without clear classification of the location of the aneurysm, studies not specifying the number of patients treated with each of the techniques or not discriminated between aortic pathologies (juxtarenal, paravisceral and thoracoabdominal), hybrid procedures, endoanchors or with branched stent-graft.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 1533 papers were identified while papers that met inclusion criteria were either representing experience of single institution (87 papers) or from multicenter studies (6 papers), national or international registries (18 papers). In the period between January 1977 and December 2017, treatment of 5664 patients with jrAAA was reported in 87 papers as a single institution report. Out of them 2531 (45%) were treated with OR, 2592 (46%) with fEVAR and 541 (9%) with chEVAR. Out of 29 institutions reporting OR, there were 11 (37.9%) with more than 100 treated patients while 21 (41.1%) out of 51 institutions that reported more than 50 jrAAA treated with fEVAR. Only four institutions reported results of all three treatment modalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results reported in the literature, regardless of its complexity and costs, fEVAR for jrAAA has been accepted in substantial number of hospitals worldwide, while number of reported procedures is reaching OR.


KEY WORDS: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endovascular procedures; Systematic review

inizio pagina