![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Opzioni di pubblicazione |
eTOC |
Per abbonarsi |
Sottometti un articolo |
Segnala alla tua biblioteca |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Estratti |
Permessi |
Share |


I TUOI DATI
I TUOI ORDINI
CESTINO ACQUISTI
N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
COME ORDINARE
I TUOI ABBONAMENTI
I TUOI ARTICOLI
I TUOI EBOOK
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITÀ
REVIEWS RECENT ADVANCES IN RENAL ARTERY STENTING
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2010 October;51(5):747-54
Copyright © 2010 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
lingua: Inglese
Efficacy of embolic protection devices in renal artery stenting
Campbell J. E. 1, Stone P. A. 1, Bates M. C. 1, 2 ✉
1 Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Charleston Division, Charleston, WV, USA 2 Vascular Center of Excellence, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, USA
The efficacy of embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been studied extensively in coronary saphenous vein grafts and extra cranial cerebrovascular disease. Recent ex-vivo and in-vivo renal artery stenting studies suggest atheroembolism is not unique to the coronary and cerebrovascular domain and it seems intuitive, renal EPDs may be beneficial. In an attempt to better understand the current objective evidence regarding renal protection efficacy we systematically reviewed the contemporary literature and summarize the findings herein. There is increasing observational data suggesting the use of embolic protection devices decrease the risk of continued decline in renal function after renal artery stenting. There is also prospective randomized data to suggest that the use of adjuvant IIb/IIIa glycoprotein inhibitor and embolic protection has synergistic benefit, but this is a very small series. However, there are currently no well controlled prospective trials to conclude the added risk and expense of renal protection is countered by proven clinical benefit. Based on the literature compiled in this manuscript we do believe EPDs should be considered in some high-risk patients.